Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 15018/11, 61199/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,3502) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HARAKCHIEV AND TOLUMOV v. BULGARIA
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 15018/11, 61199/12
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 15018/11
- EGMR - 15018/11 (anhängig)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 15018/11
After analysing in detail the relevant constitutional and Convention provisions and making reference to, among others, the cases of Campbell v. the United Kingdom (25 March 1992, Series A no. 233), Calogero Diana v. Italy (15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V) and Petra v. Romania (23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII), it held that a blanket authorisation to inspect the correspondence of all detainees without regard to their particular circumstances and the threat which they allegedly posed to society through such correspondence was contrary to the relevant provisions of the 1991 Constitution. - EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 15018/11
However, Article 13 of the Convention does not go so far as to guarantee a remedy allowing a Contracting State's laws as such to be challenged before a national authority on the ground of being contrary to the Convention or to equivalent domestic legal norms (see, among other authorities, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 85, Series A no. 98, and Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, § 56, ECHR 2003-VI).