Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TATAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  TATAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 51928/15

  Merits 106. The Court notes that, for a number of years, the applicants had neither any news of their missing brother Mayr-Ali Vakhayev nor any plausible explanation or reliable information about what had become of him following his disappearance during the special operation on 11 February 2010 (see Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, 9 November 2006).

  The Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damages claimed by the applicants and the violation of the Convention and that this may, where appropriate, include compensation for loss of earnings applicable to spouses, elderly parents and minor children (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 58055/10

  DOSHUYEVA AND YUSUPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 51928/15

  Considering the overall time frame for lodging of the application (see Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 165, ECHR 2009), along with the applicants" stance in the criminal proceedings, the Court finds that the applicants in Tatayev and Others (no. 51928/15) complied with the admissibility criteria (contrast Doshuyeva and Yusupov v. Russia (dec.), no. 58055/10) and the Government's objection in this regard is dismissed.

• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 36255/16

  TURAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the violations found and the documents submitted, the Court awards the applicant EUR 15, 000 in respect of pecuniary damage (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts), and compare with Pugoyeva v. Russia [Committee], no. 43479/14, §§ 64-66, 7 December 2021, and Tatayev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 51928/15, §§ 111-14, 19 October 2021), EUR 26, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 2, 500 for costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on the applicant on those amounts.
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 7434/18

  GORDANOVY v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the documents in its possession and it's relevant practice (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts) and compare with Pugoyeva v. Russia [Committee], no. 43479/14, §§ 64-66, 7 December 2021, Tatayev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 51928/15, §§ 111-14, 19 October 2021, and Turayeva v. Russia [Committee], no. 36255/16, §§ 12-14, 21 June 2022), the Court awards the applicants jointly EUR 2, 000 in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 120, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable on those amounts.