Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALTIUS INSURANCE LTD v. CYPRUS

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ALTIUS INSURANCE LTD v. CYPRUS

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints of a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time are set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 105, 12 October 2021; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; and Kud?‚a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  This runs counter to the Court's case-law to the effect that the protection of human rights must be practical and effective and not theoretical and illusory, as required by the principle of effectiveness which is inherent in the Convention (see, inter alia, Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33 and 47-48, Series A no. 37).
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 10597/03

  Rechtssache O. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The Court therefore finds it necessary to join the Government's objections to the merits of the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention (see, for example, FIL LLC v. Armenia, no. 18526/13, § 44, 31 January 2019, and Ommer v. Germany (no. 1), no. 10597/03, § 50, 13 November 2008).

 
• EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

  McFARLANE v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints of a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time are set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 105, 12 October 2021; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; and Kud?‚a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06

  VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  Having regard to the duration of the proceedings (see paragraph 63 above), the Court considers, without anticipating the examination of whether the "reasonable time" requirement in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was complied with, that the applicant company's complaint is prima facie "arguable" (see, mutatis mutandis, Vlad and Others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06 and 2 others, § 113, 26 November 2013).
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 40547/10

  TECHNIKI OLYMPIAKI A.E. c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The Court reiterates, in particular, that remedies available to an individual at domestic level for raising a complaint about the length of proceedings are "effective" within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention if they can be used to expedite the proceedings before the national courts or provide the individual with adequate redress for delays that have already occurred (see Sürmeli, cited above, § 99, and Techniki Olympiaki A.E. v. Greece (dec.), no. 40547/10, § 29, 1 October 2013).
• EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 31386/17

  KIRINCIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  It is reiterated that a remedy available to a litigant at domestic level for raising a complaint about the length of proceedings is "effective" within the meaning of Article 13 and Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, only if it is capable of covering all stages of the proceedings complained of and thus, in the same way as a decision given by the Court, of taking into account their overall length (see, among others, Kirincic and Others v. Croatia, no. 31386/17, § 110, 30 July 2020; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 79, ECHR 2005-X; Koumoutsea and Others v. Greece, no 56625/00, § 17, 6 March 2003).
• EGMR, 29.06.2010 - 24216/06

  PAWEL GLADKOWSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  However, having considered the facts of the case, the parties' submissions and its findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application and it is not necessary to provide a separate ruling on this complaint (see, mutatis mutandis, Pawe?‚ G?‚adkowski v. Poland, no. 24216/06, §§ 87-88, 29 June 2010, with further references).
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 79177/16

  MARSHALL AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The applicant company has not disputed, and at this time the Court therefore has no reason to doubt, that actions for compensation under Law 2(I)/2010 are heard within a reasonable time, that compensation is paid promptly and that the rules regarding legal costs do not place an excessive burden on litigants (see, mutatis mutandis, Marshall and Others v. Malta, no. 79177/16, § 82, 11 February 2020).
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 43391/18

  BARA AND KOLA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints of a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time are set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 105, 12 October 2021; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; and Kud?‚a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 11388/15

  GLAVINIC AND MARKOVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2022 - 43078/15

  TABOURET c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 21091/07

  MICHAILIDOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
• EGMR, 19.01.2006 - 38775/02

  WALDNER v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 31.08.2018 - 35142/15

  BALOGH AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2005 - 60227/00

  BAKO v. SLOVAKIA
• BFH, 08.10.2012 - I B 76/12

  Ergehen des FG-Urteils ohne mündliche Verhandlung bei fehlendem Einverständnis …
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  PANAYI v. CYPRUS