Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WIERZBICKI AND WIERZBICKA v. POLAND

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  WIERZBICKI v. POLAND

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  The scope of the Court's supervisory role in balancing the two competing interests is set out in more detail in Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) ([GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 104-07, ECHR 2012) and Axel Springer AG v. Germany ([GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 85-88, 7 February 2012).
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

  A. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  The general principles on the right to respect for private life in the context of the right to protection of reputation are set out in A. v. Norway (no. 28070/06, §§ 63-65, 9 April 2009) and H.L. v. Poland ((dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  I v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Special diligence and good judgment on the part of journalists are also called for in the context of releasing and commenting on highly intimate and sensitive medical data, for example concerning a private individual's mental health (see, regarding leaks of medical data, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 40, 17 July 2008; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 128, 30 October 2012; L.H. v. Latvia, no. 52019/07, § 56, 29 April 2014; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016; and Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 86, 26 January 2017).

 
• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 57375/08

  Abtreibungsverbot in Polen: Lebensschützer und der "Fall Agata"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Special diligence and good judgment on the part of journalists are also called for in the context of releasing and commenting on highly intimate and sensitive medical data, for example concerning a private individual's mental health (see, regarding leaks of medical data, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 40, 17 July 2008; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 128, 30 October 2012; L.H. v. Latvia, no. 52019/07, § 56, 29 April 2014; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016; and Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 86, 26 January 2017).
• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 33677/10

  FÜRST-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Moreover, where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the domestic courts in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria, nos. 33677/10 and 52340/10, § 40, 17 May 2016, and Marta Jelsevar and Others v. Slovenia, no. 47318/07, § 32, 11 March 2014).
• EGMR, 21.11.2013 - 16882/03

  PUTISTIN v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  On the other hand, the above-mentioned elements made it possible for people who already knew the applicants or those who lived in their local community to identify them and to associate them with the information provided in the programme to the effect that they were real-estate "cheats" and had mental-health issues (see paragraph 8 above; see also, mutatis mutandis, Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 62 in fine, ECHR 2003-I; A. v. Norway, cited above, § 70; and SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação v. Portugal, no. 29856/13, § 67, 27 July 2021; compare Putistin v. Ukraine, no. 16882/03, § 38, 21 November 2013).
• EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 42788/06

  SURIKOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Special diligence and good judgment on the part of journalists are also called for in the context of releasing and commenting on highly intimate and sensitive medical data, for example concerning a private individual's mental health (see, regarding leaks of medical data, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 40, 17 July 2008; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 128, 30 October 2012; L.H. v. Latvia, no. 52019/07, § 56, 29 April 2014; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016; and Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 86, 26 January 2017).
• EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  JELSEVAR AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Moreover, where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the domestic courts in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria, nos. 33677/10 and 52340/10, § 40, 17 May 2016, and Marta Jelsevar and Others v. Slovenia, no. 47318/07, § 32, 11 March 2014).
• EGMR, 27.07.2021 - 29856/13

  SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  On the other hand, the above-mentioned elements made it possible for people who already knew the applicants or those who lived in their local community to identify them and to associate them with the information provided in the programme to the effect that they were real-estate "cheats" and had mental-health issues (see paragraph 8 above; see also, mutatis mutandis, Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 62 in fine, ECHR 2003-I; A. v. Norway, cited above, § 70; and SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação v. Portugal, no. 29856/13, § 67, 27 July 2021; compare Putistin v. Ukraine, no. 16882/03, § 38, 21 November 2013).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 40378/06

  Y.Y. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  Special diligence and good judgment on the part of journalists are also called for in the context of releasing and commenting on highly intimate and sensitive medical data, for example concerning a private individual's mental health (see, regarding leaks of medical data, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 40, 17 July 2008; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 128, 30 October 2012; L.H. v. Latvia, no. 52019/07, § 56, 29 April 2014; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016; and Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 86, 26 January 2017).
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 14781/07

  H.-L. v. POLAND