Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,19074) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRESHAJ c. FINLANDE
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRESHAJ v. FINLAND
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94
In the field of immigration Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the Convention with due regard to the needs and resources of the community and of individuals (Eur. Court H.R., Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, pp. 33-34, para. 67). - EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89
CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94
Insisting on family unity when part of the family has gone into hiding to avoid the enforcement could, for instance, seriously impede the effectiveness of immigration control (cf. Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, Comm. Report 7.6.90, para. 101, Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 201, p. 48). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94
However, "the expulsion of an asylum seeker may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned faced a real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the country to which he is to be returned" (Eur. Court H.R. Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p 34, para. 102). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13343/87
B. c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94
In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual, as well as to the margin of appreciation afforded to the Contracting States (Eur. Court H.R., B. v. France judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 232-C, pp. 47 et seq., paras. 44 et seq.). - EKMR, 15.05.1980 - 8317/78
McFEELEY et al. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.05.1994 - 23159/94
An assessment of whether such treatment is in breach of this provision must take account of all the circumstances of the case, the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the complainant (cf. e.g. No. 8317/78, Dec. 15.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 44 at p. 79).