Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Informationsverbund Asyl und Migration

  EMRK Art. 13, EMRK Art. 3, EMRK Art. 37 Abs. 1, EMRK Art. 35 Abs. 3, EMRK Art. 35 Abs. 4, EMRK Art. 35 Abs. 1, EMRK Art. 34
  Asylverfahren, Tschechische Republik, Dublin II-VO, Dublinverfahren, Guinea, effektiver Rechtsschutz, Prozessvollmacht, Rechtsschutzinteresse, Abschiebung, Suspensiveffekt, Portugal, sichere Drittstaaten

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DIALLO v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 13+3 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award Just satisfaction reserved (2nd applicant) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 20493/07
• EGMR, 26.04.2012 - 20493/07
• EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 20493/07
• EGMR - 20493/07

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 54131/08

  BAYSAKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 20493/07

  The Court reiterates that in the circumstances of extradition or expulsion and a claim in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention, given the irreversible nature of the harm which might occur if the alleged risk of torture or ill-treatment materialised, and the importance which the Court attaches to Article 3, the notion of an effective remedy under Article 13 requires (i) close and rigorous scrutiny of a claim that there exist substantial grounds for believing that there was a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in the event of the applicant's expulsion to the country of destination, and (ii) a remedy with automatic suspensive effect (see M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 387, 21 January 2011; Baysakov and Others v. Ukraine, no. 54131/08, § 71, 18 February 2010; and Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no. 25389/05, § 66, ECHR 2007-V).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-439/14

  Star Storage - Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge - Richtlinien 89/665/EWG und …

  Vgl. u. a. Urteil des EGMR vom 23. Juni 2011, Diallo/Tschechische Republik, CE:ECHR:2011:0623JUD002049307, § 56.