Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAUDELLE c. FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAUDELLE v. FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.05.2000 - 35683/97
• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  In addition: "Special procedural safeguards may prove called for in order to protect the interests of persons who, on account of their mental disabilities, are not fully capable of acting for themselves" (see, mutatis mutandis, Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, pp. 11-12, § 22; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 24, § 60 in fine; and Prinz, cited above, § 44).
• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  The Court reiterates, however, that the Convention system requires that in certain cases the Contracting States take positive measures to guarantee effective compliance with the rights set out in Article 6 (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 18, § 36).
• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  The Court reiterates that it is not its role to decide in the abstract whether the applicable domestic law is compatible with the Convention or whether the domestic law has been complied with by the national authorities (see Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 40, § 97).

 
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  In addition: "Special procedural safeguards may prove called for in order to protect the interests of persons who, on account of their mental disabilities, are not fully capable of acting for themselves" (see, mutatis mutandis, Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, pp. 11-12, § 22; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 24, § 60 in fine; and Prinz, cited above, § 44).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  The Court's task is not to indicate those means to the States, but to determine whether the result called for by the Convention has been achieved (see, mutatis mutandis, De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 20, § 35).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86

  KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  The Court therefore joins the objection to the merits (see Kremzow v. Austria, judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-B, pp. 40-41, §§ 41-42, and Prinz v. Austria, no. 23867/94, § 30, 8 February 2000, unreported).
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86

  F.C.B. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  The Court reiterates that the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 6 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by paragraph 1; accordingly, the Court will examine the complaint under those two provisions taken together (see, among other authorities, F.C.B. v. Italy, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 208-B, p. 20, § 29).
• EGMR, 12.10.1992 - 14104/88

  T. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 35683/97

  They must exercise diligence to ensure the effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed by Article 6 (see T. v. Italy, judgment of 12 October 1992, Series A no. 245-C, p. 42, § 29).

• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 70337/01

  GÜVEÇ c. TURQUIE

  Elle rappelle à cet égard que l'accusé a le droit de bénéficier de l'assistance d'un avocat commis d'office par le juge «lorsque les intérêts de la justice l'exigent» (Vaudelle c. France, no 35683/97, § 59, CEDH 2001-I).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.07.2019 - C-467/18

  Rayonna prokuratura Lom - Vorabentscheidungsersuchen - Richtlinien 2012/13/EU, …

  18 Der EGMR hat in seinem Urteil vom 30. Januar 2001, Vaudelle gegen Frankreich (CE:ECHR:2001:0130JUD003568397, § 65), festgestellt, dass die Behörden, falls der Betroffene an psychischen Störungen leidet, zusätzliche Maßnahmen ergreifen müssen, um ihn eingehend über die Art und den Grund des gegen ihn erhobenen Tatvorwurfs zu informieren.
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 22/03

  GRIGORYEVSKIKH v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention the accused is entitled to have a lawyer assigned by the court of its own motion "when the interests of justice so require" (see Vaudelle v. France, no. 35683/97, § 59, ECHR 2001-I, and Padalov v. Bulgaria, no. 54784/00, §§ 54 and 55, 10 August 2006).
• EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 3038/03

  PYLNEV v. RUSSIA

  The circumstances of the case may require the Contracting States to take positive measures in order to enable the applicant to participate effectively in the proceedings (compare Vaudelle v. France, no. 35683/97, §§ 48-49 and §§ 55-56, ECHR 2001-I, and V. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 86).