Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAY contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 34 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (36)

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 16538/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt

  As the Court has consistently held, "where the national authorities have found a violation and their decision constitutes appropriate and sufficient redress, the party concerned can no longer claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention" and "[w]hen those two conditions are satisfied, the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention precludes an examination by the Court" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, §§ 64-70, Series A no. 51; Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, ECHR 2000-XI; Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, ECHR 2004-VI, Göktepe v. Turkey (dec.), no. 64731/01, 26 April 2005; and Yüksel v. Turkey (dec.), no. 51902/08, § 46, 9 April 2013).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 13237/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt

  As the Court has consistently held, "where the national authorities have found a violation and their decision constitutes appropriate and sufficient redress, the party concerned can no longer claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention" and "[w]hen those two conditions are satisfied, the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention precludes an examination by the Court" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, §§ 64-70, Series A no. 51; Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, ECHR 2000-XI; Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, ECHR 2004-VI, Göktepe v. Turkey (dec.), no. 64731/01, 26 April 2005; and Yüksel v. Turkey (dec.), no. 51902/08, § 46, 9 April 2013).
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 13071/03

  STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  The Court reiterates that where an applicant concludes a settlement in the domestic proceedings and renounces further use of local remedies, he or she will generally no longer be able to claim to be a victim in respect of those matters (see Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, ECHR 2000-XI; Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V; and Nikishina v. Russia (dec.), no. 45665/00, 12 September 2000).

 
• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 63543/09

  DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  In cases of negligence imputable to the State, the Court had already accepted that where an applicant accepts a sum of compensation in settlement of civil claims and renounces further use of domestic remedies, he or she will generally no longer be able to claim to be a victim in respect of those matters (see Chennouf and Others v. France, no. 4704/19, § 39, 20 June 2023; see also Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V; Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, 17 October 2000; Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 5 September 2007; and Gray v. Germany and the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 49278/09, § 83, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 49278/09

  GRAY v. GERMANY AND UNITED KINGDOM

  Where a relative accepts a sum of compensation in settlement of civil claims and renounces further use of local remedies therefore, he or she will generally no longer be able to claim to be a victim in respect of those matters (see Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V; Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, 17 October 2000; and Bailey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39953/07, 5 September 2007).
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 76973/01

  MURILLO SALDIAS ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  La Cour note qu'en l'espèce, indépendamment de la procédure pénale dans laquelle le premier requérant s'est constitué partie accusatrice, il a aussi entamé une procédure contentieuse-administrative en responsabilité contre l'administration et s'est vu allouer une indemnisation pour réparation de la mort de ses proches (Caraher c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 24520/94, CEDH 2000-I, et Hay c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 41894/98, CEDH 2000-XI ; Göktepe c. Turquie (déc.), no 64731/01, 26 avril 2005), établie par l'Audiencia nacional, de 210 354, 24 EUR pour chacun des membres de sa famille qui périrent dans l'inondation, ainsi que de 9 200 EUR pour les frais d'obsèques de ces derniers.
• EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 21387/05

  BANKS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  If they had, issues would have arisen as to whether they could still claim to be victims or had in fact exhausted domestic remedies since six applicants settled the civil claims which they had brought alleging assault by prison officers and systemic negligence on the part of the prison service, while the other two did not bring any such proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894/98, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44166/15

  PENATI c. ITALIE

  Elle repose d'ailleurs sur une jurisprudence concernant la responsabilité des agents de l'État à raison de l'utilisation de la force meurtrière (Caraher c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 24520/94, CEDH 2000-I, et Hay c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 41894/98, CEDH 2000-XI) qui semble avoir été dépassée par des décisions plus récentes affirmant le principe, contraire, selon lequel l'obtention d'une somme dans le cadre de procédures civiles ou administratives ne saurait suffire à ôter aux requérants la qualité de victimes (voir Saçilik et autres c. Turquie, nos 43044/05 et 45001/05, § 69, 5 juillet 2011 et, mutatis mutandis, Jeronovics c. Lettonie [GC], no 44898/10, §§ 76-77, 5 juillet 2016).
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 35622/04

  Diego Garcia

  The Court would reiterate that the possibility of obtaining compensation in civil proceedings for the claims of breaches of the rights invoked in the present case will generally, and in normal circumstances, constitute an adequate and sufficient remedy Where applicants accept a sum of compensation in settlement of civil claims and renounce further use of local remedies therefore, they will generally no longer be able to claim to be a victim in respect of those matters (see application nos. 5577-5583/72, Donnelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, dec. 15.12.75, DR 4 p. 4 at pp. 86-87, Caraher v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I; Hay v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 41894/98, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64625/11

  TURGUT c. TURQUIE

  Lorsque ces deux conditions sont remplies, la nature subsidiaire du mécanisme de protection de la Convention empêche un examen de la part de la Cour (Eckle c. Allemagne, 15 juillet 1982, §§ 64-70, série A no 51, Caraher c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 24520/94, CEDH 2000-I, Hay c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 41894/98, CEDH 2000-XI, Cataldo c. Italie (déc.), no 45656/99, CEDH 2004-VI, Göktepe c. Turquie (déc.), no 64731/01, 26 avril 2005, et Yüksel c. Turquie (déc.), no 51902/08, § 46, 9 avril 2013).
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 41792/10

  ERKAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 34215/11

  KOLACZYK AND KWIATKOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 3449/09

  VOLKAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 3757/09

  ALP c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 51902/08

  YÜKSEL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 39870/11

  ATAY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 39953/07

  BAILEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 22465/03

  SANDRU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 36293/02

  TEMESAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 49438/99

  STAYKOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 26.04.2005 - 64731/01

  GÖKTEPE c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 21356/12

  ZALADIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 54999/10

  MILIC ET NIKEZIC c. MONTÉNÉGRO
• EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 30484/04

  ROSCA PELAU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09

  HEMSWORTH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 42078/02

  ALDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 25.05.2010 - 45428/04

  ARSLAN ET KAMURBAY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 51144/06

  BARIS DEMIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 4457/04

  IOCSA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 38719/09

  WENERSKI v. POLAND (No. 2)
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 31151/08

  OBIORA v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 69762/01

  AYDIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 47092/99

  EKIMDJIEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2003 - 55554/00

  RECHACHI AND ABDELHAFID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 16074/03

  LOVYGINA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 31552/07

  GUDEK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE