Lacking any evidence of proper notification, the Court accepts the applicant's submissions that he was not aware of the date and venue of the final cassation hearing, and that this prevented him from attending and defending his rights (compare Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 24271/05, § 29, 17 January 2008; Maksimov v. Azerbaijan, no. 38228/05, § 37, 8 October 2009; Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 41, 3 February 2011; and Religious Community of Jehovah's Witnesses and Hansen v. Azerbaijan, no. 52682/07, § 28, 30 January 2020).

Noting the admission contained in the Government's declaration and the amount of compensation proposed - which is consistent with the amounts awarded in recent similar cases (see, for example, Kotlyar v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 36124/13, 10 November 2022; Kharlamov and Shcherbatenko v. Russia [Committee], nos. 40959/19 and 19258/20, 23 June 2022; and Religious Community of Jehovah's Witnesses and Hansen v. Azerbaijan [Committee], no. 52682/07, § 42, 30 January 2020) - the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue its examination of this part of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention).