Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BIANCARDI v. ITALY

  No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BIANCARDI v. ITALY

  Art. 11, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• afp 2022, 220

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 3002/03

  TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1 et N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  3002/03 and 23676/03, §§ 40-43, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  Where the balancing exercise between, on the one hand, freedom of expression protected by Article 10, and, on the other, the right to respect for one's private life, as enshrined in Article 8 of the Convention, has been undertaken by the national authorities, in conformity with the criteria laid down by the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see, among other authorities, Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 57, ECHR 2011, and Delfi AS cited above, § 139).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  In this regard, the applicable domestic law (see Article 11 of Legislative Decree no. 196/2003), read in the light of the international legal instruments (see Article 5 (e) of the updated Convention ETS no. 108 and Article 17 § 1 a) of the GDPR) supports the idea that the relevance of the applicant's right to disseminate information decreased over the passage of time, compared to V.X."s right to respect for his reputation (in this respect, compare and contrast Éditions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, §§ 53-57, ECHR 2004-IV, where the more time elapsed, the greater the public interest in discussing of the history of President Mitterrand's time in office prevailed over the President's rights with regard to medical confidentiality.

 
• EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 10692/09

  SAVVA TERENTYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  The Court notes at the outset that it has dealt with Article 10 cases concerning Internet publications in which the subject matter was an article or a post with defamatory or offensive content (see Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, §§ 131-139, ECHR 2015; Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692/09, 28 August 2018; and Kablis v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 48310/16

  KABLIS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  48310/16 and 59663/17, 30 April 2019).
• EuGH, 13.05.2014 - C-131/12

  Der Betreiber einer Internetsuchmaschine ist bei personenbezogenen Daten, die auf …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  (Case C-131/12) 19. In its grand chamber judgment of 13 May 2014 in Google Spain SL and Google Inc., C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317, the CJEU was called upon to interpret Directive 95/46/EC.
• EuGH, 24.09.2019 - C-136/17

  Das Verbot der Verarbeitung bestimmter Kategorien sensibler personenbezogener …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  GC, AF, BH, ED v. CNIL (Case C-136/17) 23. In a judgment of 24 September 2019 in GC and Others (De-referencing of sensitive data), C-136/17, EU:C:2019:773, the CJEU was called upon to interpret Directive 95/46/EC following a request for a preliminary ruling concerning four decisions delivered by the National Commission on Data Processing and Civil Liberties (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés - CNIL) refusing to serve formal notices on Google requiring it to de-reference various links appearing in the lists of results displayed following searches of their names and leading to Internet pages published by third parties.
• EuGH, 24.09.2019 - C-507/17

  Der Betreiber einer Suchmaschine ist nicht verpflichtet, eine Auslistung in allen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 77419/16

  Google LLC v. CNIL (Case C-507/17) 25. In a judgment of 24 September 2019 in Google (Territorial scope of de-referencing), C-507/17, EU:C:2019:772, the CJEU was called upon to interpret Directive 95/46/EC following a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the imposition by CNIL on Google of a penalty of EUR 100, 000 because of that company's refusal, when granting a de-referencing request, to apply it to all of its search engine's domain name extensions.

• EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 40519/15

  BORISLAV TONCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Indeed, the data contained in a criminal record, though often based on a court judgment delivered in public, are sensitive and may affect the individual concerned, and are hence linked to his or her private life (see E.B. and Others v. Austria, cited above, § 75 in fine; see also, mutatis mutandis, Biancardi v. Italy, no. 77419/16, § 67, 25 November 2021, and Hurbain v. Belgium [GC], no. 57292/16, § 215 in fine, 4 July 2023).
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 57292/16

  HURBAIN c. BELGIQUE

  Les autres options consistent en la désindexation de l'article (solution jugée compatible avec l'article 10 de la Convention dans l'affaire Biancardi c. Italie, no 77419/16, 25 novembre 2021), sa modification (solution écartée dans l'affaire Fuchsmann c. Allemagne, no 71233/13, 19 octobre 2017, au regard de l'article 8) ou encore l'insertion d'une notice (solution jugée compatible avec l'article 10 dans l'affaire Times Newspapers Ltd c. Royaume-Uni (nos 1 et 2), nos 3002/03 et 23676/03, CEDH 2009).

  En ce qui concerne, premièrement, la nature de l'information archivée, la Cour a qualifié, dans sa jurisprudence récente, les données pénales comme étant des données sensibles (Biancardi c. Italie, no 77419/16, § 67, 25 novembre 2021).