Rechtsprechung
EGMR - 868/15 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02
E.B. v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15
In support of his position, the first applicant relied on the case of Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), and E.B. v. France, ([GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008). - EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 33290/96
SALGUEIRO DA SILVA MOUTA c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15
In support of his position, the first applicant relied on the case of Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), and E.B. v. France, ([GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008). - EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 3932/02
BATSANINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15
Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?. - EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 5447/03
KOROLEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15
Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?. - EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 42454/02
MENCHINSKAYA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15
Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?.
- VG Aachen, 30.05.2016 - 2 K 37/14
Fahrtenbuchauflage wegen nötigenden Verhalten durch zu dichtes Auffahren
An dieser rechtlichen Wertung hat sich auch durch die zum 1. Mai 2014 in Kraft getretenen Neuordnung des bisherigen 18-Punktesystems auf ein 8-Punktesystem im Verkehrszentralregister bis zur Entziehung einer Fahrerlaubnis gemäß § 4 Abs. 5 Satz 1 Nr. 3 StVG und der damit einhergehenden Änderung der Anlage 13 zu § 40 FeV nichts geändert, vgl. BVerwG, Urteil vom 28. Mai 2015 - 3 C 13/14 -, Rz. 21 ff. und etwa OVG NRW, Beschluss vom 13. Oktober 2015 - 868/15 - Rz. 27, jeweils juris.