Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,13013) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DREIBLATS v. LATVIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99
Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07
However, noting the strong affinity between Article 35 § 1 and Article 13, the Court has ruled that if a single remedy does not by itself entirely satisfy the requirements of Article 13, the aggregate of remedies provided for under domestic law may do so (see Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 75, ECHR 2002-I; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI, § 157; and T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V, § 107). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07
The Court further reiterates that the purpose of the above rule is to afford the Contracting State the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violation alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court; nevertheless the rule must be applied without excessive formalism (see Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
McFARLANE v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07
The only remedies which Article 35 § 1 requires to be exhausted are those that relate to the breach alleged and are available and sufficient (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010), namely, a remedy that offers a chance of redressing the alleged breach and is not a pure repetition of a remedy already exhausted. - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25644/94
T.W. v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07
There is no requirement to use another remedy which has essentially the same objective (see T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, § 34, 29 April 1999).
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11
BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA
The only remedies which Article 35 § 1 requires to be exhausted are those which relate to the alleged breach and which are available and sufficient (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010), that is to say a remedy that offers the chance of redressing the alleged breach and is not a pure repetition of a remedy already exhausted (see Dreiblats v. Latvia (dec.), no. 8283/07, 4 June 2013).