Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA

  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 75725/01

  TROCELLIER v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  It is now well established that although the right to health is not as such among the rights guaranteed under the Convention or its Protocols (see Fiorenza v. Italy (dec.), no. 44393/98, 28 November 2000; Pastorino and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 17640/02, 11 July 2006; and Dossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 26053/07, 12 October 2010), the High Contracting Parties have, parallel to their positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, a positive obligation under Article 8, firstly, to have in place regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of their patients' physical integrity and, secondly, to provide victims of medical negligence with access to proceedings in which they can, where appropriate, obtain compensation for damage (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102 and 103, 2 June 2009; Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, §§ 82 and 86-87, 25 September 2012; Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, §§ 41 and 43, 15 January 2013; and S.B. v. Romania, no. 24453/04, §§ 65-66, 23 September 2014).

 
• EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10

  VASILEVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  It should further be borne in mind that in discharging their positive obligations towards the alleged victims of medical malpractice, the authorities must also have regard to counter-considerations, such as the risk of unjustifiably exposing medical practitioners to liability, which can compromise their professional morale and induce them to practise, often to the detriment of their patients, what has come to be known as "defensive medicine" (see Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796/10, § 70, 17 March 2016, and Jurica v. Croatia, no. 30376/13, § 89, 2 May 2017).
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 54969/09

  MEHMET ULUSOY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  However, if deemed effective, such proceedings would by themselves be capable of satisfying the procedural obligation of Article 8 (see Mehmet Ulusoy and Others v. Turkey, no. 54969/09, § 92, 25 June 2019, with further references, and, mutatis mutandis, and albeit in the context of defamation proceedings examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, Petrella v. Italy, no. 24340/07, § 53, 18 March 2021).
• EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07

  PETRELLA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  However, if deemed effective, such proceedings would by themselves be capable of satisfying the procedural obligation of Article 8 (see Mehmet Ulusoy and Others v. Turkey, no. 54969/09, § 92, 25 June 2019, with further references, and, mutatis mutandis, and albeit in the context of defamation proceedings examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, Petrella v. Italy, no. 24340/07, § 53, 18 March 2021).
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 30376/13

  JURICA v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  It should further be borne in mind that in discharging their positive obligations towards the alleged victims of medical malpractice, the authorities must also have regard to counter-considerations, such as the risk of unjustifiably exposing medical practitioners to liability, which can compromise their professional morale and induce them to practise, often to the detriment of their patients, what has come to be known as "defensive medicine" (see Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796/10, § 70, 17 March 2016, and Jurica v. Croatia, no. 30376/13, § 89, 2 May 2017).
• EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 58240/08

  SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  In determining whether the State has fulfilled its positive procedural obligation to set up an effective independent judicial system, the Court will examine whether the available legal remedies, taken together, as provided for in law and applied in practice, secured the effective legal means capable of establishing the relevant facts, holding accountable those at fault and providing appropriate redress to the victim (see Sarishvili-Bolkvadze v. Georgia, no. 58240/08, § 79, 19 July 2018).
• EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 76774/01

  POCKAJEVS c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  The Court notes here that, except in cases of manifest arbitrariness or error, it is not its function to call into question findings of fact made by the domestic authorities, particularly when it comes to scientific expert assessments, which by definition call for specific and detailed knowledge of the subject (see Pockajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 27524/09

  MOVSESYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  However, those measures are connected to employment regulations rather than the establishment of medical malpractice as such (see Movsesyan v. Armenia, no. 27524/09, § 71, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 06.12.2001 - 44393/98

  FIORENZA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 26053/07

  DOSSI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 19764/07

  SPYRA ET KRANCZKOWSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  DUMPE v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 17640/02

  PASTORINO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 12370/10

  AKSOY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 31697/03

  BERDZENISHVILI v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 63789/13

  SCRIPNIC c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.07.2017 - C-42/17

  M.A.S. und M.B. - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Schutz der finanziellen …

  38 Vgl. den Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Rates über die Errichtung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 17. Juli 2013 (COM[2013] 534 final) und den Entwurf einer Verordnung über die Errichtung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 31. Januar 2017 (Dokument 5766/17).

  41 Vgl. Grünbuch zum strafrechtlichen Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften und zur Schaffung einer Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft der Kommission vom 11. Dezember 2001 (COM[2001] 715 final); Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament, den Rat, den Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuss und den Ausschuss der Regionen vom 26. Mai 2011 über den Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Union durch strafrechtliche Vorschriften und verwaltungsrechtliche Untersuchungen, Gesamtkonzept zum Schutz von Steuergeldern (COM[2011] 293 final); SFI-Richtlinienvorschlag; Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament, den Rat, den Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuss und den Ausschuss der Regionen vom 17. Juli 2013, Besserer Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Union, Errichtung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft und Reform von Eurojust (COM[2013] 532 final); Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament, den Rat und die nationalen Parlamente vom 27. November 2013 über die Überprüfung des Vorschlags für eine Verordnung des Rates über die Errichtung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft in Bezug auf den Subsidiaritätsgrundsatz gemäß Protokoll Nr. 2 (COM[2013] 851 final) (Punkt 2.3); Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Rates vom 17. Juli 2013 über die Errichtung der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft (COM[2013] 534 final) (…vgl. insbesondere das Finanzblatt, Punkt 1.5, S. 55) sowie Entwurf einer Verordnung vom 31. Januar 2017 über die Errichtung einer Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft (Dokument 5766/17); und schließlich Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament gemäß Artikel 294 Absatz 6 AEUV betreffend den Standpunkt des Rates in erster Lesung im Hinblick auf den Erlass einer Richtlinie des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. Mai 2017 über die strafrechtliche Bekämpfung von gegen die finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Union gerichtetem Betrug (COM[2017] 246 final) (Ziffer 3).

• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 47358/20

  C. v. ROMANIA

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that, if deemed effective, criminal-law remedies would by themselves be capable of satisfying the procedural obligation of Article 8 (see Botoyan v. Armenia, no. 5766/17, § 109 in fine, 8 February 2022, with further references).
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 21648/11

  TRASKUNOVA v. RUSSIA

  It has held in particular that States are bound to adopt the necessary regulatory measures to ensure that doctors consider the foreseeable impact of a planned medical procedure on their patients' physical integrity and to inform patients of these consequences beforehand in such a way that the latter are able to give informed consent (see Ionita v. Romania, no. 81270/12, § 84, 10 January 2017, in the context of the Article 2 complaint; and Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, § 42, 15 January 2013; and Botoyan v. Armenia, no. 5766/17, § 93, 8 February 2022, in the context of the Article 8 complaint).