Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASILEVA v. BULGARIA
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (17) Neu Zitiert selbst (16)
- EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
At the same time, the High Contracting Parties have a margin of appreciation in choosing how to comply with their positive obligations under the Convention (see, as a recent authority, Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 144, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), and enjoy considerable freedom in the choice of the means calculated to ensure that their judicial systems meet its requirements (see, albeit in different contexts, König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 100, Series A no. 27; Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, §§ 83 and 84, 16 November 2010; and Finger v. Bulgaria, no. 37346/05, § 120, 10 May 2011). - EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11
HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
47039/11 and 358/12, § 119, ECHR 2012 (extracts)), and in choosing how to comply with their positive obligations and organise their judicial systems (see paragraph 67 above), there is no basis on which to hold that the Convention requires a special mechanism which facilitates the bringing of medical malpractice claims or a reversal of the burden of proof in such cases, as suggested by the applicant. - EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 45305/99
POWELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
In Bulgaria, as in many other High Contracting Parties (see, for instance, Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V; Iversen v. Denmark, no. 5989/03, § 54, 28 September 2006; Colak and Tsakiridis v. Germany, nos.
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 77144/01
Rechtssache C. und T. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
- EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 75725/01
TROCELLIER v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
It is now well established that although the right to health is not as such among the rights guaranteed under the Convention or its Protocols (see Fiorenza v. Italy (dec.), no. 44393/98, 28 November 2000; Pastorino and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 17640/02, 11 July 2006; and Dossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 26053/07, 12 October 2010), the High Contracting Parties have, parallel to their positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, a positive obligation under its Article 8, firstly, to have in place regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of their patients" physical integrity and, secondly, to provide victims of medical negligence access to proceedings in which they could, in appropriate cases, obtain compensation for damage (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Benderskiy v. Ukraine, no. 22750/02, §§ 61-62, 15 November 2007; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-03, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, §§ 55-57, 5 January 2010; Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, §§ 82 and 86-87, 25 September 2012; Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, §§ 41 and 43, 15 January 2013; and S.B. v. Romania, no. 24453/04, §§ 65-66, 23 September 2014). - EGMR, 04.01.2005 - 14462/03
PENTIACOVA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
The Court finds that this complaint is to be examined solely under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no. 14462/03, ECHR 2005-I). - EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 25266/05
YARDIMCI c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
It is now well established that although the right to health is not as such among the rights guaranteed under the Convention or its Protocols (see Fiorenza v. Italy (dec.), no. 44393/98, 28 November 2000; Pastorino and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 17640/02, 11 July 2006; and Dossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 26053/07, 12 October 2010), the High Contracting Parties have, parallel to their positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, a positive obligation under its Article 8, firstly, to have in place regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of their patients" physical integrity and, secondly, to provide victims of medical negligence access to proceedings in which they could, in appropriate cases, obtain compensation for damage (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Benderskiy v. Ukraine, no. 22750/02, §§ 61-62, 15 November 2007; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-03, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, §§ 55-57, 5 January 2010; Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, §§ 82 and 86-87, 25 September 2012; Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, §§ 41 and 43, 15 January 2013; and S.B. v. Romania, no. 24453/04, §§ 65-66, 23 September 2014). - EGMR, 04.01.2008 - 23800/06
SHELLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
In view of the broad margin of appreciation enjoyed by the High Contracting Parties in laying down their health care-policy (see Pentiacova and Others, cited above; Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800/06, 4 January 2008; and Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 5989/03
IVERSEN v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
In Bulgaria, as in many other High Contracting Parties (see, for instance, Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V; Iversen v. Denmark, no. 5989/03, § 54, 28 September 2006; Colak and Tsakiridis v. Germany, nos. - EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 8759/05
CSOMA v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 23796/10
It is now well established that although the right to health is not as such among the rights guaranteed under the Convention or its Protocols (see Fiorenza v. Italy (dec.), no. 44393/98, 28 November 2000; Pastorino and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 17640/02, 11 July 2006; and Dossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 26053/07, 12 October 2010), the High Contracting Parties have, parallel to their positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, a positive obligation under its Article 8, firstly, to have in place regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of their patients" physical integrity and, secondly, to provide victims of medical negligence access to proceedings in which they could, in appropriate cases, obtain compensation for damage (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Benderskiy v. Ukraine, no. 22750/02, §§ 61-62, 15 November 2007; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-03, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, §§ 55-57, 5 January 2010; Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, §§ 82 and 86-87, 25 September 2012; Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, §§ 41 and 43, 15 January 2013; and S.B. v. Romania, no. 24453/04, §§ 65-66, 23 September 2014). - EGMR, 06.12.2001 - 44393/98
FIORENZA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 26053/07
DOSSI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 35493/05
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 45325/06
LOPEZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 19764/07
SPYRA ET KRANCZKOWSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 17640/02
PASTORINO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17
BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA
It should further be borne in mind that in discharging their positive obligations towards the alleged victims of medical malpractice, the authorities must also have regard to counter-considerations, such as the risk of unjustifiably exposing medical practitioners to liability, which can compromise their professional morale and induce them to practise, often to the detriment of their patients, what has come to be known as "defensive medicine" (see Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796/10, § 70, 17 March 2016, and Jurica v. Croatia, no. 30376/13, § 89, 2 May 2017). - EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 50772/11
ERDINÇ KURT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Elle rappelle également que les principes qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence relative ŕ l'article 2 de la Convention dans le domaine de la négligence médicale s'appliquent également sous l'angle de l'article 8 lorsqu'il s'agit d'atteintes ŕ l'intégrité physique ne mettant pas en cause le droit ŕ la vie (voir, entre autres, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et Codarcea c. Roumanie, no 31675/04, § 101, 2 juin 2009). - EGMR, 23.02.2021 - 63687/14
VILELA ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
Elle rappelle également que les obligations découlant de l'article 8 de la Convention coďncident largement avec celles découlant de l'article 2 (Brincat et autres c. Malte, nos 60908/11 et 4 autres, § 102, 24 juillet 2014, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et, pour les principes généraux, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, §§ 185-196, 19 décembre 2017).
- EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 54969/09
MEHMET ULUSOY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
La Cour a déjŕ rappelé qu'entrent dans le champ de l'article 8 de la Convention les questions liées ŕ l'intégrité morale et physique des individus, tout comme celles relevant du droit ŕ la santé de ces derniers (paragraphe 64 in fine ci-dessus) et qu'en la matičre les principes dégagés de l'article 2 relativement ŕ la protection de la vie des malades valent sans conteste (voir, par exemple, Trocellier, décision précitée, Geceku?u c. Turquie (déc.), no 28870/05, 25 mai 2010, Dossi et autres c. Italie (déc.), no 26053/07, 12 octobre 2010, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et Erdinç Kurt et autres, précité, § 51). - OLG München, 27.06.2012 - 20 U 5093/11 unter Abänderung des Urteils der 22. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts München I vom 24.11.2011 - 23796/10 - die Klage abzuweisen,.
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 18308/10
B.I. c. TURQUIE
Elle rappelle également que les obligations découlant de l'article 8 coďncident largement avec celles de l'article 2 de la Convention (Brincat et autres c. Malte, nos 60908/11 et 4 autres, § 102, 24 juillet 2014, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et, pour les principes généraux, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, §§ 164-196, 19 décembre 2017). - EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 55431/09
BARLETTA ET FARNETANO c. ITALIE
Cela implique, entre autres, que la procédure soit achevée dans un délai raisonnable (Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 65, 17 mars 2016). - EGMR, 13.04.2023 - 14709/07
MAYBORODA v. UKRAINE
In the light of its case-law, the Court considers that the present complaints fall to be examined under Article 8 of the Convention (compare Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 66, ECHR 2007-I; Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796/10, § 57-58, 17 March 2016; and Y.P. v. Russia, no. 43399/13, §§ 34 and 37-38, 20 September 2022). - EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 36105/17
DURAK c. TURQUIE
Elle rappelle également que les principes qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence relative ŕ l'article 2 de la Convention dans le domaine de la négligence médicale s'appliquent aussi sous l'angle de l'article 8 lorsqu'il est question d'atteintes ŕ l'intégrité physique ne mettant pas en cause le droit ŕ la vie (voir, entre autres, Codarcea c. Roumanie, no 31675/04, § 101, 2 juin 2009, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et, pour les principes généraux, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, §§ 185-196, 19 décembre 2017). - EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 55303/12
KANAL c. TURQUIE
Elle rappelle également que les obligations découlant de l'article 8 coďncident largement avec celles de l'article 2 de la Convention (Brincat et autres c. Malte, nos 60908/11 et 4 autres, § 102, 24 juillet 2014, Vasileva c. Bulgarie, no 23796/10, § 63, 17 mars 2016, et, pour les principes généraux, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, §§ 185-196, 19 décembre 2017). - EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 43185/11
ELVAN ALKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 10491/12
IBRAHIM KESKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 42821/18
M c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 15297/17
MARCIULESCU ET NEACSU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 19499/10
ASKIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 12370/10
AKSOY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 58402/09
DEMIR v. TURKEY