Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,16109) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NEMTSOVA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NEMTSOVA v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02
GONGADZE c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
The domestic authorities' scrutiny in respect of a case concerning a contract killing must aim to go beyond the identification of a hitman, and it is incumbent on the Court to satisfy itself that the investigation in the present case addressed this important point (see, among others, Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, § 176, ECHR 2005-XI; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, §§ 115-16, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others, cited above, § 75). - EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
As regards the refusal by the Government to produce copies of the relevant documents with reference to Article 161 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court observes that in several previous cases it has already found this explanation insufficient to justify the withholding of key information requested by it (see, for example, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts), and Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079/04, § 145, 28 October 2010). - EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 25091/07
ENUKIDZE AND GIRGVLIANI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
Therefore, not all traceable witnesses were interviewed in the present case (contrast, among other cases, Zdjelar and Others, cited above, § 89) - on the contrary, it is clear that a number of persons who could have provided the authorities with information of crucial importance for the case were never examined in any of the relevant proceedings, or were not asked key questions (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 79, ECHR 2000-VI, and Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 266, 26 April 2011). - EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 20914/07
CARTER v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
In the present case, the Court will take into account the Government's unjustified refusal to submit the requested documentation in light of the principle that the Government bears the burden of proof so as to demonstrate that the Russian authorities have carried out an effective investigation capable of leading to the establishment of the facts and the bringing to justice of those who had organised and commissioned Mr Nemtsov's killing (see, among others, mutatis mutandis, Carter v. Russia, no. 20914/07, § 143, 21 September 2021). - EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10
HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
The domestic authorities' scrutiny in respect of a case concerning a contract killing must aim to go beyond the identification of a hitman, and it is incumbent on the Court to satisfy itself that the investigation in the present case addressed this important point (see, among others, Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, § 176, ECHR 2005-XI; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, §§ 115-16, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others, cited above, § 75).