Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAMOYLOVA v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SAMOYLOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 98, ECHR 2012, and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013; see also Armoniene v. Lithuania, no. 36919/02, § 36, 25 November 2008, and Rodina v. Latvia, nos.
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  The courts did not weigh whether the disclosure of the address on national television in a popular programme had served any legitimate and compelling purpose, for instance, the journalists" exercise of their freedom of expression together with the public's right to be informed in relation to matters of general interest (see, in the same vein, Alkaya, cited above, §§ 35-40; the relevant domestic provisions in paragraphs 23-24 and 26 above; see also Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 155-62, 8 November 2016, and Khadija Ismayilova, cited above, § 147).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  For its part, the Court reiterates that the concept of "private life" under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008, and Vukota-Bojic v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, § 52, 18 October 2016).

 
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 35030/13

  Petra Reski

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  As to the accuracy and reliability of the information, the Court reiterates that when contributing to public debate on matters of legitimate concern and acting in good faith, the press should normally be entitled to rely on the content of official reports without having to undertake independent research (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 68 and 72, ECHR 1999-III; Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 65, ECHR 2002-V; Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 35030/13, § 46, 19 October 2017; and Mityanin and Leonov v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  As to the accuracy and reliability of the information, the Court reiterates that when contributing to public debate on matters of legitimate concern and acting in good faith, the press should normally be entitled to rely on the content of official reports without having to undertake independent research (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 68 and 72, ECHR 1999-III; Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 65, ECHR 2002-V; Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 35030/13, § 46, 19 October 2017; and Mityanin and Leonov v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313; Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, §§ 45-46, ECHR 2001-III; Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003-V; and Ormanni v. Italy, no. 30278/04, § 59, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  As to the issue of unfairness resulting from the reasoning adopted by the domestic courts, the Court reiterates that it is not for it to deal with alleged errors of law or fact committed by the national courts unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention, for instance where, in exceptional cases, such errors may be said to constitute "unfairness" incompatible with Article 6 of the Convention (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  For its part, the Court reiterates that the concept of "private life" under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008, and Vukota-Bojic v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, § 52, 18 October 2016).
• EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 51279/99

  Frankreich wegen Verletzung der Pressefreiheit zu Schadensersatz verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  As to the accuracy and reliability of the information, the Court reiterates that when contributing to public debate on matters of legitimate concern and acting in good faith, the press should normally be entitled to rely on the content of official reports without having to undertake independent research (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 68 and 72, ECHR 1999-III; Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 65, ECHR 2002-V; Verlagsgruppe Droemer Knaur GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 35030/13, § 46, 19 October 2017; and Mityanin and Leonov v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 36919/02

  ARMONIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 49108/11

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 98, ECHR 2012, and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013; see also Armoniene v. Lithuania, no. 36919/02, § 36, 25 November 2008, and Rodina v. Latvia, nos.
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

  MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.01.2019 - 47881/11

  PRUNEA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2019 - 25689/10

  JEAN-JACQUES MOREL CONTRE LA FRANCE ET 7 AUTRES AFFAIRES
• EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 48534/10

  RODINA v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 50123/06

  MILISAVLJEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 30278/04

  ORMANNI c. ITALIE

• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 36345/16

  L.B. v. HUNGARY

  Compte tenu de la nature relativement sensible de ces informations (Samoylova c. Russie, no 49108/11, §§ 100-101, 14 décembre 2021), un examen parlementaire suffisant était particulièrement important dans les circonstances de l'espèce.

  Dans l'arrêt, il est fait référence aux affaires Alkaya c. Turquie (no 42811/06, 9 octobre 2012) et Samoylova c. Russie (no 49108/11, 14 décembre 2021).

• EGMR - 35505/22 (anhängig)

  SAUSA v. ITALY

  Has there been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for her private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the reporting of her unpaid debt to the Bank of Italy (see, mutatis mutandis, M.S. v. Sweden, no. 20837/92, § 35, 27 August 1997; and compare with Vukota-Bojic v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, § 47, 18 October 2016) and of the inclusion of her full name, date of birth and amount of the debt in the Central Credit Register (see, in particular, M.N. and Others v. San Marino, no. 28005/12, § 51-53, 7 July 2015; Samoylova v. Russia, no. 49108/11, §§ 62-63, 14 December 2021; and L.B. v. Hungary [GC], no. 36345/16, §§ 102-06, 9 March 2023)?.