Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12, 5728/17, 39583/17, 45189/18   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,14833
EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12, 5728/17, 39583/17, 45189/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,14833)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.06.2022 - 4693/12, 5728/17, 39583/17, 45189/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,14833)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Juni 2022 - 4693/12, 5728/17, 39583/17, 45189/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,14833)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,14833) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MKHITARYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA

    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 24/11

    CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    24/11/2016 -13/09/2019.

    on 24/11/2016.

    25/11/2015 - 24/11/2016.

    5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - right to be heard either in person or through some form of representation at the court session on 24/11/2016.

    24/11/2016 - the date of the applicant's conviction or release is unknown.

    Kentron and Nork Marash District Court of Yerevan on 24/11/2016.

    5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - right to be heard either in person or through some form of representation at the court session on 24/11/2016 (see Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, § 235, 31 May 2011).

    24/11/2016 -.

    Kentron and Nork Marash District Court of Yerevan on 24/11/2016.

  • EGMR, 20.10.2016 - 629/11

    ARA HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC] (no. 23755/07, §§ 84 et seq., 5 July 2016); Ara Harutyunyan v. Armenia (no. 629/11, §§ 48 et seq., 20 October 2016); and Khodorkovskiy v. Russia (no. 5829/04, § 235, 31 May 2011).

    (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, §§ 84 et seq., 5 July 2016, and Ara Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 629/11, §§ 48 et seq., 20 October 2016).

  • VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04
    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    26/04/2011 -13/04/2012.
  • KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11

    Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    21/11/2016.
  • KAG Freiburg, 02.08.2010 - 13/09

    Wahlanfechtung

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    24/11/2016 -13/09/2019.
  • RG, 12.07.1905 - V 23/05

    Bergschäden

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    23/05/2017.
  • RG, 29.09.1906 - V 22/06

    Öffentliche Flüsse

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    22/06/2018.
  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    The Convention here refers essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules of national law, but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the aim of Article 5, namely to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II; Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, § 47, ECHR 2003-IV; and Vasenin v. Russia, no. 48023/06, § 108, 21 June 2016).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 50272/99

    HUTCHISON REID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    The Convention here refers essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules of national law, but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the aim of Article 5, namely to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II; Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, § 47, ECHR 2003-IV; and Vasenin v. Russia, no. 48023/06, § 108, 21 June 2016).
  • EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 13610/12

    VARDAN MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 4693/12
    In the leading case of Vardan Martirosyan v. Armenia (no. 13610/12, 15 June 2021), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present cases.
  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 48023/06

    VASENIN v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht