Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH CONTRE LA FRANCE

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH AGAINST FRANCE

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 8916/05
• EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 8916/05
• EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 8916/05
• EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 8916/05
• EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 8916/05

Wird zitiert von ... (12)

• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  France, the Court also acknowledged that measures taken by the French authorities (the taxation of "gifts from hand to hand" (dons manuels)) in relation to the practices and places of worship of the religion in question amounted to interference with the exercise of the rights protected by Article 9 of the Convention (see Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France, no. 8916/05, § 53, 30 June 2011; Association Cultuelle du Temple Pyramide v. France, no. 50471/07, §§ 34-35, 31 January 2013; and Association des Chevaliers du Lotus d'Or v. France, no. 50615/07, §§ 33-34, 31 January 2013).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  In the context of the exhaustion of domestic remedies, most notably in cases involving issues of exhaustion in substance, the Court has, along with the factual situation presented in the light of national law, placed emphasis on the Convention arguments relied upon at the national level (see, for example, Guzzardi, cited above, § 72; Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 45, Series A no. 104; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, §§ 32-36, Series A no. 200; B. v. France, 25 March 1992, §§ 37-39, Series A no. 232-C; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, §§ 24-32, Series A no. 236; Gasus Dosier- und Fördertechnik GmbH v. the Netherlands, 23 February 1995, §§ 47-49, Series A no. 306-B; Ahmet Sadik v. Greece, 15 November 1996, §§ 27-34, Reports 1996-V; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 33-39, ECHR 1999-I; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §§ 38-42, ECHR 2004-III; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 142-146, ECHR 2010; Gatt v. Malta, no. 28221/08, §§ 21-25, ECHR 2010; Association Les témoins de Jéhovah v. France (dec.), no. 8916/05, 21 September 2010; Karapanagiotou and Others v. Greece, no. 1571/08, §§ 25-30, 28 October 2010; and Merot d.o.o. and Storitve Tir d.o.o. v. Croatia (dec.), no. 29426/08 and 29737/08, 10 December 2013).
• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 53254/20

  U c. FRANCE

  Pour être recevable devant la Cour, le grief invoqué par la partie requérante doit avoir été soulevé devant le dernier niveau de juridiction interne (Association Les Témoins de Jehovah c. France (déc.), no 8916/05, 21 septembre 2010).

 
• EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 41282/16

  M.O. v. SWITZERLAND

  While Article 35 § 1 of the Convention must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism, it normally requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the competent domestic courts, at least in substance (ibid.; see also Association Les témoins de Jéhovah v. France (dec.), no. 8916/05, 21 September 2010).
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10

  TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Collecting donations is also an important aspect of freedom of religion guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention, for without financial resources, religious associations might be unable to provide religious services or ensure their survival (see Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France, no. 8916/05, §§ 49 and 53, 30 June 2011).
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 31172/19

  JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. FINLAND

  The applicant community maintained that the Court had repeatedly held in its case-law that a church or ecclesiastical body could itself exercise on behalf of its adherents the rights guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention (reference was made to Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 101, ECHR 2001-XII, and Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France, no. 8916/05, § 51, 30 June 2011).
• EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Court can well understand such an assessment by the national courts of the facts of the present case, although it may be that in certain circumstances issues concerning the operation of religious buildings, including expenses incurred as a result of the taxation status of such buildings, are capable of having an impact on the exercise of the right of members of religious groups to manifest religious belief (see, mutatis mutandis, Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France, no. 8916/05, §§ 48-54, 30 June 2011).
• EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 15352/11

  NIKOLIC v. SERBIA

  This means that if the applicant has not relied on the provisions of the Convention, he or she must have raised arguments to the same or like effect on the basis of domestic law, in order to have given the national courts the opportunity to redress the alleged breach in the first place (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 142, 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; Radomilja and Others, cited above, § 117; Karapanagiotou and Others v. Greece, no. 1571/08, § 29, 28 October 2010; Maric v. Croatia, no. 50132/12, § 53, 12 June 2014; Portu Juanenea and Sarasola Yarzabal v. Spain, no. 1653/13, §§ 62-63, 13 February 2018; and, in relation to a complaint that was not raised, even implicitly, at the final level of jurisdiction, Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France (dec.), no. 8916/05, 21 September 2010; and Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 29.09.2020 - 50856/16

  GEORGIEV c. BULGARIE

  En l'espèce, en admettant que, au vu de l'évolution de la jurisprudence interne (paragraphe 12 ci-dessus), l'action engagée par le requérant pour contester la paternité d'E.B. pouvait apparaître comme un recours suffisamment effectif dont l'épuisement était justifié et que son introduction a dès lors suspendu le cours du délai de six mois (voir Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, § 132, 19 décembre 2017, et Fernie c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 14881/04, 5 janvier 2006), l'intéressé était tenu de soulever jusqu'au dernier niveau de juridiction les griefs qu'il entendait formuler par la suite devant la Cour (Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah c. France (déc.), no 8916/05, 21 septembre 2010).
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 20165/20

  ASSEMBLÉE CHRÉTIENNE DES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH D'ANDERLECHT ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Sauf dans des cas très exceptionnels, le droit à la liberté de religion tel que l'entend la Convention, exclut toute appréciation de la part de l'État sur la légitimité des croyances religieuses ou sur les modalités d'expression de celles-ci (Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah c. France, no 8916/05, § 48, 30 juin 2011).
• EGMR, 23.04.2019 - 12977/10

  VELICKOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 69720/16

  H.I. v. SWITZERLAND