Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 27144/22 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SAMUOLIS v. LITHUANIA
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR - 27144/22
Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaint under Article 8, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Draksas, cited above, § 68; see also, mutatis mutandis, Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 65, Series A no. 28)?. - EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06
EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung
Auszug aus EGMR - 27144/22
a) In particular, has there been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life or correspondence, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention by the retention and transfer to third persons of the data gathered during the pre-trial investigations (see Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 173, ECHR 2015)?. - EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …
Auszug aus EGMR - 27144/22
b) If so, was that interference in accordance with the law (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 55 and 56, ECHR 2000-II; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 76, 28 June 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 78, 10 March 2009, and Karabeyoglu v. Turkey, no. 30083/10, § 69, 7 June 2016) and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see Roman Zakharov, cited above, § 231; see also Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, §§ 334 and 335, 25 May 2021)?. - EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 62540/00
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND EKIMDZHIEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 27144/22
b) If so, was that interference in accordance with the law (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 55 and 56, ECHR 2000-II; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 76, 28 June 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 78, 10 March 2009, and Karabeyoglu v. Turkey, no. 30083/10, § 69, 7 June 2016) and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see Roman Zakharov, cited above, § 231; see also Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, §§ 334 and 335, 25 May 2021)?. - EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 30083/10
KARABEYOGLU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 27144/22
b) If so, was that interference in accordance with the law (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 55 and 56, ECHR 2000-II; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 76, 28 June 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 78, 10 March 2009, and Karabeyoglu v. Turkey, no. 30083/10, § 69, 7 June 2016) and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see Roman Zakharov, cited above, § 231; see also Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, §§ 334 and 335, 25 May 2021)?.