Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 52941/99, 48063/99, 27526/95, 43925/98, 42579/98, 39813/98, 40986/98, 42594/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÜLTEKIN ET AUTRES CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 7 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÜLTEKIN AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY AND 7 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 52941/99
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 52941/99
- EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 52941/99, 48063/99, 27526/95, 43925/98, 42579/98, 39813/98, 40986/98, 42594/98
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04
MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA
S'il suffit, même en l'absence d'un constat formel, d'une motivation donnant à penser que le magistrat ou l'agent public considère l'intéressé comme coupable, l'expression prématurée d'une telle opinion par le tribunal lui-même bafoue incontestablement la présomption d'innocence (voir, parmi d'autres arrêts, Deweer c. Belgique, 27 février 1980, § 56, série A no 35 ; Minelli c. Suisse, 25 mars 1983, §§ 27, 30 et 37, série A no 62 ; Allenet de Ribemont c. France, 10 février 1995, §§ 35-36, série A no 308, et Karakas et Yesilırmak c. Turquie, no 43925/98, § 49, 28 juin 2005). - EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 16270/12
COMORASU c. ROUMANIE
À ce propos, il faut rappeler qu'eu égard à la difficulté de la mission de la police dans les sociétés contemporaines et à l'imprévisibilité du comportement humain, il y a lieu d'interpréter l'étendue de la responsabilité pesant sur les autorités internes de manière à ne pas imposer à celles-ci un fardeau insupportable (voir, mutatis mutandis, Günaydin c. Turquie, no 27526/95, § 31, 13 octobre 2005). - EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 32510/09
CAZANBAEV c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Aux yeux de la Cour, ces blessures révèlent en soi le caractère excessif de la force employée par les policiers (voir, mutatis mutandis, Günaydin c. Turquie, no 27526/95, § 32, 13 octobre 2005). - EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 13139/08
STEFANELLI c. ITALIE
La conférence incriminée a donc été marquée par la prudence et la discrétion afin de garantir la présomption d'innocence, comme exigé par la jurisprudence de la Cour (voir, notamment, Karakas et Yesilirmark c. Turquie, no 43925/98, 28 juin 2005 ; Bohmer c. Allemagne, no 37568/97, 3 octobre 2002 ; Nestak c. Slovaquie, no 65559/01, 27 février 2007 ; et Dovzhenko c. Ukraine, no 36650/03, 12 janvier 2012).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.05.2002 - 43925/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARAKAS and YESILIRMAK v. TURKEY
Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2002 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARAKAS AND YESILIRMAK v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2002 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official regards the accused as guilty (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 30, § 56, Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, p. 15, §§ 27 and 37, and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 16, §§ 35-36). - EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official regards the accused as guilty (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 30, § 56, Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, p. 15, §§ 27 and 37, and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 16, §§ 35-36). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79
Minelli ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official regards the accused as guilty (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 30, § 56, Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, p. 15, §§ 27 and 37, and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 16, §§ 35-36).
- EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78
Adolf ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
Nevertheless, whether a statement of a public official is in breach of the principle of the presumption of innocence must be determined in the context of the particular circumstances in which the impugned statement was made (see, inter alia, Adolf v. Austria, judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, pp. 17-19, §§ 36-41). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were backed up by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2278, § 62, Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-111, and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were backed up by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2278, § 62, Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-111, and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 43925/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARAKAS AND YESILIRMAK v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2002 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 43925/98
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98