Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (149) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 25.06.1992 - 13778/88
THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
In the case of Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland (judgment of 25 June 1992, §§ 46-54, Series A no. 239) the Court found no violation of Article 6 § 1, having established that the applicant's fears of a lack of impartiality were not objectively justified.It found no violation of Article 6 on the ground that at the sittings held in the public prosecutor's absence the court was not called upon to investigate the merits of the case, let alone to assume any function which might have been fulfilled by the prosecutor had he been present (judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 24, § 53).
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V). - EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
- EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously considered that appearances may be of importance in court proceedings, for instance for assessing compliance with the requirement of objective impartiality, or for the sake of preserving the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 77, ECHR 2007-IV; Sara Lind Eggertsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 31930/04, § 42, ECHR 2007-VIII; and Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 32, 1 April 2010). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
Thus, the appeal proceedings did not remedy the impartiality matter arising at the trial (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86, and Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, § 134, ECHR 2005-XIII). - EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07
KASPAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
DRIZA c. ALBANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
In that connection, the Court considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11
NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014). - EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 34449/03
SHULEPOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 17995/02
STOIMENOV v.
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 5447/03
KOROLEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 40408/18
GORYUNKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 76201/17
KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 38503/18
MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 60-84, 20 September 2016) and Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, § 168, 5 January 2016).6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Domestic courts denied the applicant's motion to ensure the participation of the prosecutor in the administrative proceedings, the prosecutor was absent (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08,.
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 51766/21
RYAKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO). - EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 33552/21
KUZNETSOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 09.03.2017 - C-685/15
Online Games u.a. - Art. 49 und 56 AEUV - Glücksspiele - Glücksspielmonopol in …
29 Dazu zählen die Urteile vom 15. Dezember 2005, Kyprianou/Zypern (CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD007379701, §§ 118, 121 und 126 bis 128), vom 18. Mai 2010, 0zerov/Russland (CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD006496201, §§ 51 bis 54), und vom 20. September 2016, Karelin/Russland (CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000092608).55 Urteil vom 20. September 2016, Karelin/Russland (CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD000092608).
- EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 28232/22
FIGURKA v. UKRAINE
The applicant also referred to the Court's judgment in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, 20 September 2016), and submitted that the first-instance court had examined the case in the absence of a prosecutor and had therefore assumed the function of the prosecution.They distinguished the present case from that of Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).
The absence of a prosecuting party at an oral hearing may raise an issue under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention since it may give rise to doubts about the court's objective impartiality by leading the court to take up the prosecution's case and may cause difficulty in the exercise of the defendant's rights to be informed of "the nature and cause of the accusation", to have "adequate time and facilities" for the preparation of defence and by undermining the defendant's ability to put forward an adequate defence in adversarial proceedings (see Thorgeir Thorgeirson, cited above, §§ 16-20 and 46-54; Weh and Weh v. Austria ((dec.), no. 38544/97, 4 July 2002; Ozerov v. Russia, no. 64962/01, §§ 51-58, 18 May 2010; Krivoshapkin v. Russia, no. 42224/02, §§ 41-46, 27 January 2011; Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, §§ 116-20, 30 May 2013; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-84, 20 September 2016; Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 82-84, 13 February 2018; Mikhaylova v. Ukraine, no. 10644/08, §§ 61-70, 6 March 2018; Hasanov and Majidli v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 41809/21
SELYAYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 4604/17
DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019, and Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017 as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 40133/21
PAPULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 40953/21
LEVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 1469/19
POTAPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 1434/18
ANTROPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 26935/21
BEREZUTSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 35579/21
KINZHABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 53913/15
BORISOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 2064/18
NELYUBIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 50067/18
BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 52479/22
RADCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 31856/21
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 14858/21
PARAMOSHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18
ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 38346/21
VASIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 21782/21
ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 12166/19
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 26942/21
GLUSHCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38671/21
PEREVOZCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 24722/18
SLIVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 1097/18
CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 2523/21
PETROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 25187/15
LUTSEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 71114/17
OLSHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 43191/21
KIRSANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 44630/21
KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 44147/21
POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 13038/18
SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 32180/21
YELYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 46570/18
NURUSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 52365/22
VAKULKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 39222/21
PROGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33196/22
ABROSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 41806/21
KAMENTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 16047/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 31649/22
STRELETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 13238/21
DANKOVSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 2097/22
SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 46694/21
BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 57580/21
SOLOVYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 28133/21
KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 40486/21
PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 54089/21
LEVKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 25863/21
ILYIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33633/21
GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 40064/21
MAMONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 54470/21
IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 55480/21
PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47048/21
MAKSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 48029/21
YERMOLAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 45205/22
ATAMANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 63772/17
BUKHTENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 49997/21
KANYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 51373/21
USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 25870/21
GRYAZEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 57870/21
GENERALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 884/22
PANTENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 69539/12
IMRET v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 43655/21
PULUDI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18
TINGAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 32174/21
YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 4815/18
KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 28538/21
BIREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 38070/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57518/22
BOBROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43487/21
MOLCHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 52077/22
NAZAREDSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43566/21
GORODNICHEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 61147/13
TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 52342/20
LAVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34241/16
KHORRSHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13
MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17
KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 44292/18
FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 43267/21
SAVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 44105/21
DORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 50116/18
ABAKUMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 2954/18
MAZANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20
MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 2825/21
STALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51074/21
AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 3345/18
OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 83654/17
SAVELYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 15326/19
SARANCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 44850/18
KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 23169/18
VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 984/15
MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51391/21
TARASENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 41853/21
NADAREYSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24326/18
KUSHTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 65015/19
BUZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 2838/22
BORIS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 54923/21
GALIMULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 26870/19
ANDREYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 16001/17
KAPITONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 60851/12
VARZHABETYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 4792/22
ABAKUMETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75231/17
YURGILEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 8793/17 (anhängig)
FERENETS v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 54250/18
KOLESNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 14839/21
BAKHMATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 2829/18
BOYARSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 41761/20
KUSHNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 13679/18
NIKOLENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 44712/18 (anhängig)
KADYROV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
- EGMR - 14379/18 (anhängig)
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
- EGMR - 74186/17 (anhängig)
ORLOVSKIY AND SANGORSKIY v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 16154/19
OOO ORION AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 21527/18
KOTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 711/18
POPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 75484/14 (anhängig)
MONAKHOV v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR - 24712/21 (anhängig)
KUZMIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
- EGMR - 43224/17 (anhängig)
ZAVOROTNYKH v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications
- EGMR - 73383/17 (anhängig)
MOCHALOV v. RUSSIA and17 other applications
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75530/17
ABLYAKIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 78796/17
GORSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 33409/17 (anhängig)
SAULYAK v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications
- EGMR - 11180/18 (anhängig)
ZHILKIN v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
- EGMR - 719/19 (anhängig)
YERSHOV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR, 25.05.2023 - 13359/19
RECHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 56109/13
KAPUSTINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 35000/13
TSUKANOV AND TORCHINSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 27023/18 (anhängig)
YELMAKOV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR - 78686/17 (anhängig)
VASHCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
- EGMR - 83527/17 (anhängig)
PETROV v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
- EGMR - 47409/18 (anhängig)
HILL v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
- EGMR - 13644/21 (anhängig)
GRESKO v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
- EGMR - 39000/18 (anhängig)
STRUNIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
- EGMR - 226/18 (anhängig)
YEVSTIFEYEV v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
- EGMR - 2388/18 (anhängig)
BATUSOVA v. RUSSIA and 12 other applications
- EGMR - 84346/17 (anhängig)
YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
- EGMR - 48403/18 (anhängig)
FAYZRAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 26200/20
KULAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 74343/17 (anhängig)
VALKOVICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 76249/17 (anhängig)
ZBOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.04.2023 - 70345/17
SLASTENIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 16694/13
ASAINOV AND SIBIRYAK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 47810/17 (anhängig)
SEMENOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 41535/17 (anhängig)
SHIROKOV v. RUSSIA