Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SARDINAS ALBO c. ITALIE [Extraits]

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. e, Art. 3, Art. 14 MRK
  Partiellement recevable Partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SARDINAS ALBO v. ITALY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. e, Art. 3, Art. 14 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00
• EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  The provisions of this law are described in Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, 6 September 2001, ECHR 2001-IX.

  Moreover, it is now clear that, given the wording of the Act and the background to its adoption, the remedy in question must be exhausted also by those persons who introduced their claims in Strasbourg before the date of its entry into force (see, amongst other authorities, Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, 6 September 2001, ECHR 2001-IX).

• EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

  ASCH v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  The Court must ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole were fair (Van Mechelen and others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 711, § 50, and Asch v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, § 26).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  It is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to establish the facts and resolve problems of interpretation of domestic legislation (see, among others authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, CEDH 1999-I, § 28).

 
• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88

  HENTRICH v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 18, § 33, and Remli v. France, judgment of 23 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II, p. 571, § 33).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1212, § 71, and Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 18, § 37).
• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86

  B. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 56271/00

  After the date of the Como District Court's judgment, the applicant's deprivation of liberty was based on Article 5 § 1 (a) of the Convention as "the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court" and cannot therefore be taken into account for the purposes of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see, for instance, B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, p. 14, § 36).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.08.2008 - C-296/08

  Santesteban Goicoechea - Europäischer Haftbefehl - Auslieferungsersuchen - …

  32 - Vgl. Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Urteile Mamatkoulov und Askarov/Türkei vom 4. Februar 2005 (Beschwerden Nr. 46827/99 und 46951/99), Recueil des arrêts et décisions 2005-I, § 82, RAF/Spanien vom 21. November 2000 (Beschwerde Nr. 53652/00), Recueil des arrêts et décisions 2000-XI, und Sardinas Albo/Italien vom 8. Januar 2004 (Beschwerde Nr. 56271/00), Recueil des arrêts et décisions 2004-I, sowie Entscheidung Zaratin/Italien vom 23. November 2006 (Beschwerde Nr. 33104/06).