Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,46171
EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00 (https://dejure.org/2005,46171)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.02.2005 - 56271/00 (https://dejure.org/2005,46171)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. Februar 2005 - 56271/00 (https://dejure.org/2005,46171)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,46171) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SARDINAS ALBO v. ITALY

    Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objections rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies victim) Violation of Art. 5-3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses (Convention ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (40)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

    W. c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    They referred, on this point, to the findings of the Court in the cases of Stögmüller, Wemhoff and W. v. Switzerland, where delays similar to those imputable to the Italian authorities had not been considered excessive (see Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9; Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A).

    Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30, and Pantano v. Italy, no. 60851/00, § 66, 6 November 2003).

  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

    TOMASI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    However, the existence of a strong suspicion of the involvement of a person in serious offences, while constituting a relevant factor, cannot alone justify a long period of pre-trial detention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, § 89, and Scott v. Spain, judgment quoted above, p. 2401, § 78).
  • EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

    Eckle ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    The Court first notes that in their comments on the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, the Government acknowledged that the deduction of the time spent in custody from the sentence does not deprive a person of the quality of victim under Article 5 § 3. Even assuming that this statement should not be interpreted as an implicit withdrawal of the Government's objection, the Court recalls that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 30, § 66. For the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 18, § 34 and Schlader v. Austria (Dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).
     
  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

    Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    They referred, on this point, to the findings of the Court in the cases of Stögmüller, Wemhoff and W. v. Switzerland, where delays similar to those imputable to the Italian authorities had not been considered excessive (see Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9; Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A).
  • EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

    LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    The Court first notes that in their comments on the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, the Government acknowledged that the deduction of the time spent in custody from the sentence does not deprive a person of the quality of victim under Article 5 § 3. Even assuming that this statement should not be interpreted as an implicit withdrawal of the Government's objection, the Court recalls that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 30, § 66. For the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 18, § 34 and Schlader v. Austria (Dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).
  • EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

    Stögmüller ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    They referred, on this point, to the findings of the Court in the cases of Stögmüller, Wemhoff and W. v. Switzerland, where delays similar to those imputable to the Italian authorities had not been considered excessive (see Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9; Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A).
  • EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

    CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    Referring to the Court's approach in the case of Clooth v. Belgium (see judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 225, p. 14, § 35), the Government considered that the period to be taken into consideration under Article 5 § 3 should end on the day on which the first order for detention with a view to extradition was issued (15 May 1998).
  • EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 40877/98

    CORDOVA c. ITALIE (N° 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    The Court notes that, although Article 35 § 4 of the Convention allows it to reject an application that it finds inadmissible under Article 35 at any stage in the proceedings, it has held that only new information and exceptional circumstances would induce it to reconsider its dismissal of an objection which was lodged and considered at the admissibility stage (see Cisse v. France, no. 51346/99, § 32, ECHR 2002-III, and Cordova v. Italy (No. 1), no. 40877/98, § 31, CEDH 2003-I).
  • EGMR, 22.06.1972 - 2614/65

    RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
    Moreover, it should be recalled that the fact of deducting the time spent in detention on remand from the prison sentence imposed on a person does not in any way acquire the character of restitutio in integrum, for no freedom is given in place of the freedom unlawfully taken away (see Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment (article 50) of 22 June 1972, Series A no. 15, p. 8, § 21).
  • EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 140/10

    Belgien wegen Auslieferung von Ex-Fußballprofi verurteilt

    La Cour rappelle que la procédure d'extradition n'emporte pas une contestation sur les droits et obligations de caractère civil d'un requérant ni n'a trait au bien-fondé d'une accusation en matière pénale dirigée contre lui au sens de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention (Raf c. Espagne (déc.), no 53652/00, 21 novembre 2000, Peñafiel Salgado c. Espagne (déc.), no 65964/01, 16 avril 2002, Sardinas Albo c. Italie (déc.), no 56271/00, CEDH 2004-I, Cipriani c. Italie (déc.), no 22142/07, 30 mars 2010, et Schuchter, décision précitée).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2006 - 56581/00

    SEJDOVIC c. ITALIE

    Toutefois, le simple fait de nourrir des doutes quant aux perspectives de succès d'un recours donné qui n'est pas de toute évidence voué à l'échec ne constitue pas une raison valable pour justifier la non-utilisation de recours internes (Sardinas Albo c. Italie (déc.), no 56271/00, CEDH 2004-I, et Brusco c. Italie (déc.), no 69789/01, CEDH 2001-IX).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 67021/01

    Tatar und Tatar ./. Rumänien

    Selon la jurisprudence constante de la Cour, les frais et dépens exposés par le requérant ne peuvent lui être remboursés que dans la mesure où se trouvent établis leur réalité, leur nécessité et le caractère raisonnable de leur taux (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Belziuk c. Pologne, arrêt du 25 mars 1998, Recueil 1998-II, p. 573, § 49, et Sardinas Albo c. Italie, no 56271/00, § 110, 17 février 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht