Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 34 - Individual ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the case, and that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Bagirov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 81024/12 and 28198/15, § 106, 25 June 2020; and Ayyubzade v. Azerbaijan, no. 6180/15, § 60, 2 March 2023). - EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
This discretion as to the manner of execution of a judgment reflects the freedom of choice attached to the primary obligation of the Contracting States under the Convention to secure the rights and freedoms guaranteed (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II). - EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 53124/09
GENOVESE v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
The Court's assessment 50. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which embraces multiple aspects of a person's physical and social identity (see Genovese v. Malta, no. 53124/09, § 30, 11 October 2011, and Ramadan v. Malta, no. 76136/12, § 62, 21 June 2016).
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 76136/12
RAMADAN v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
The Court's assessment 50. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which embraces multiple aspects of a person's physical and social identity (see Genovese v. Malta, no. 53124/09, § 30, 11 October 2011, and Ramadan v. Malta, no. 76136/12, § 62, 21 June 2016). - EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
A failure on a government's part to submit such information which is in their hands without a satisfactory explanation may not only give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations, but may also reflect negatively on the level of compliance by a respondent State with its obligations under Article 38 of the Convention (see Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 202, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 12.01.1999 - 31414/96
KARASSEV v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
Although neither the right to citizenship nor the right to renounce citizenship is guaranteed as such by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court has held in a number of cases that the following actions may, in certain circumstances, raise an issue under Article 8 of the Convention because of their impact on the private life of the individual: arbitrary denial of citizenship (see Karassev v. Finland (dec.), no. 31414/96, ECHR 1999-II; Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, §§ 42-45, 30 January 2020; and Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 42387/13
K2 v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
1480/16 and 6 others, §§ 45-46, 13 January 2022); arbitrary refusal of a request to renounce citizenship (see Riener v. Bulgaria, no. 46343/99, § 154, 23 May 2006); and revocation or deprivation of citizenship (see Ramadan, cited above, § 85; K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, § 49, 7 February 2017; and Alpeyeva and Dzhalagoniya v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 81024/12
BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the case, and that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Bagirov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 81024/12 and 28198/15, § 106, 25 June 2020; and Ayyubzade v. Azerbaijan, no. 6180/15, § 60, 2 March 2023). - EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 7549/09
ALPEYEVA AND DZHALAGONIYA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
7549/09 and 33330/11, § 108, 12 June 2018). - EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 32538/10
AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16
Although neither the right to citizenship nor the right to renounce citizenship is guaranteed as such by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court has held in a number of cases that the following actions may, in certain circumstances, raise an issue under Article 8 of the Convention because of their impact on the private life of the individual: arbitrary denial of citizenship (see Karassev v. Finland (dec.), no. 31414/96, ECHR 1999-II; Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, §§ 42-45, 30 January 2020; and Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51534/08
GAKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 1480/16
HASHEMI ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN
- EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15
AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
- VG Hamburg, 01.04.2021 - 19 A 493/21
Eritrea: Kein Flüchtlingsschutz wegen Wehrdienstentzug und illegaler Ausreise
Wer sich dem Nationaldienst entzieht, wird jedenfalls nach verschiedenen Quellen als politischer Gegner des Regimes betrachtet (Human Rights Council, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea v. 9.5.2016, A/HRC/32/47, S. 13 ("Verrat") [G 1/16]; GIGA, wiedergegeben in: IRB - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada - Eritrea: Situation of people returning to the country after they either spent time, claimed refugee Status, or were seeking asylum abroad (July 2015-May 2017), vor Nr. 2.1 [G 5/15]).Die UN- Sonderberichterstatterin über die Menschenrechtslage in Eritrea hat mit ihrem Bericht (…Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of human rights in Eritrea v. 24.7.2017, Rn. 41 [G 7/17]) hiermit übereinstimmend ausgeführt, dass diejenigen, die keine Ausreisevisa erhalten können und fliehen, als Wehrdienstverweigerer oder Deserteure sowie als politische Gegner und Verräter angesehen werden (vgl. etwa HRC, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 9.5.2016, S. 13 [G 1/16];… ders., Detailed findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 8.6.2016, S. 59 (Nr. 240) [G 6/16];… ders., Report of the Detailed Findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 5.6.2015, S. 114 (Nr. 431) [G 6/15]).
- VG Hamburg, 05.01.2021 - 19 A 2955/19
Eritrea: Keine flüchtlingsschutzrelevante Verfolgung oder drohender ernsthafter …
Wer sich dem Nationaldienst entzieht, wird jedenfalls nach verschiedenen Quellen als politischer Gegner des Regimes betrachtet (Human Rights Council, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea v. 9.5.2016, A/HRC/32/47, S. 13 ("Verrat") [G 1/16]; GIGA, wiedergegeben in: IRB - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada - Eritrea: Situation of people returning to the country after they either spent time, claimed refugee status, or were seeking asylum abroad (July 2015-May 2017), vor Nr. 2.1 [G 5/15]).Die UN- Sonderberichterstatterin über die Menschenrechtslage in Eritrea hat mit ihrem Bericht (…Hu man Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea v. 24.7.2017, Rn. 41 [G 7/17]) hiermit übereinstimmend ausgeführt, dass diejenigen, die keine Ausreisevisa erhalten können und fliehen, als Wehrdienstverweigerer oder De serteure sowie als politische Gegner und Verräter angesehen werden (vgl. etwa HRC, Re port of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 9.5.2016, S. 13 [G 1/16]; ders., Detailed findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 8.6.2016,.
- VG Hamburg, 15.04.2021 - 19 A 537/21
Eritrea: Keine flüchtlingsschutzrelevante Verfolgung oder drohender ernsthafter …
Wer sich dem Nationaldienst entzieht, wird jedenfalls nach verschiedenen Quellen als politischer Gegner des Regimes betrachtet (Human Rights Council, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea v. 9.5.2016, A/HRC/32/47, S. 13 ("Verrat") [G 1/16]; GIGA, wiedergegeben in: IRB - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada - Eritrea: Situation of people returning to the country after they either spent time, claimed refugee status, or were seeking asylum abroad (July 2015-May 2017), vor Nr. 2.1 [G 5/15]).Die UN- Sonderberichterstatterin über die Menschenrechtslage in Eritrea hat mit ihrem Bericht (…Hu man Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea v. 24.7.2017, Rn. 41 [G 7/17]) hiermit übereinstimmend ausgeführt, dass diejenigen, die keine Ausreisevisa erhalten können und fliehen, als Wehrdienstverweigerer oder De serteure sowie als politische Gegner und Verräter angesehen werden (vgl. etwa HRC, Re port of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 9.5.2016, S. 13 [G 1/16];… ders., Detailed findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 8.6.2016, S. 59 (Nr. 240) [G 6/16];… ders., Report of the Detailed Findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 5.6.2015, S. 114 (Nr. 431) [G 6/15]).
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Moreover, the Government did not submit a single example of a domestic decision in which such a course of action had been successful (compare Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 1/16, § 43, 13 July 2023).