Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 23275/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,21958) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRAVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. ... 4, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88
POITRIMOL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 23275/06
The Court emphasises that although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of fair trial (see Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 34, Series A no. 277-A). - EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 52868/99
KWIATKOWSKA contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 23275/06
The Court reiterates at the same time that neither the letter nor the spirit of Article 6 of the Convention prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to the guarantees of a fair trial (see Kwiatkowska v. Italy (dec.), no. 52868/99, 30 November 2000). - EGMR, 09.09.2003 - 30900/02
JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 23275/06
Before an accused can be said to have implicitly, through his conduct, waived an important right under Article 6, it must be shown that he could reasonably have foreseen what the consequences of his conduct would be (see Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30900/02, 9 September 2003).
- EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 54630/13
GORYANOY v. UKRAINE
They cannot therefore be regarded as amounting to an arguable claim of serious ill-treatment triggering the procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention for the State to conduct an effective investigation into them (see Gavula v. Ukraine, no. 52652/07, § 61, 16 May 2013; Igars v. Latvia (dec.), no. 11682/03, § 72, 5 February 2013; and Kravchenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23275/06, § 51, 24 June 2014).