Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  G. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EKMR, 16.07.1980 - 8440/78

  CHRISTIAN AGAINST FASCISM AND RACISM v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 06.03.1989 - 13079/87

  The notion of "peaceful assembly" does not, however, cover a demonstration where the organisers and participants have violent intentions which result in public disorder (cf. No. 8440/78, Dec. 16.7.80, D.R. 21 p. 138).
• EKMR, 10.10.1979 - 8191/78

  RASSEMBLEMENT JURASSIEN AND UNITE JURASSIENNE v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 06.03.1989 - 13079/87

  However, the Commission finds that the right to freedom of peaceful assembly is one of the foundations of a democratic society (No. 8191/78, Dec. 10.10.79, D.R. 17 p. 93) and should not be interpreted restrictively.
• EKMR, 07.05.1982 - 8710/79

  X. Ltd. et Y. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 06.03.1989 - 13079/87

  It is not objectionable that the existing elements of the offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28 p. 77).

• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08

  FÁBER v. HUNGARY

  The guarantees of Article 11 of the Convention apply to all assemblies except those where the organisers and participants have violent intentions or otherwise deny the foundations of a "democratic society" (see G. v. Germany, no. 13079/87, Commission decision of 6 March 1989, Decisions and Reports (DR) 60, p. 256; Christians against Racism and Fascism v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 16 July 1980, DR 21, p. 138).
• EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 31684/05

  BARRACO c. FRANCE

  La Cour constate à cet égard que le requérant n'a pas été condamné pour avoir participé à la manifestation du 25 novembre 2002 en tant que telle, mais en raison d'un comportement précis adopté lors de la manifestation, à savoir le blocage d'une autoroute, causant par là-même une obstruction plus importante que n'en comporte généralement l'exercice du droit de réunion pacifique (voir G. c. Allemagne no 13079/87, décision de la Commission du 6 mars 1989, DR 60, p. 256).
• EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 29045/95

  MAHLER v. GERMANY

  1 (Art. 7-1) prohibits in particular that existing offences be extended to cover facts which previously clearly did not constitute a criminal offence (cf. No. 6683/74, Dec. 10.12.75, D.R. 3, p. 95; No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28, p. 77; No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60, p. 256).

 
• EKMR, 27.10.1997 - 33689/96

  ANDERSON AND NINE OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The right to freedom of assembly is one of the foundations of a democratic society and should not be interpreted restrictively (No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60 p. 256, at p. 263).

  The right is applicable to private meetings and to meetings in public thoroughfares (No. 8191/78 Dec. 10.10.79, D.R. 17 p. 119), marches (No. 8440/78 Dec. 16.7.80, D.R. 21 p. 148) and sit-ins (No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60 p. 263).

• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20

  MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  6315/09 and 12134/09, § 67, 11 February 2014; see also G. v. Germany, no. 13079/87, Commission decision of 6 March 1989, Decisions and Reports 60, p. 263).
• EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 2344/02

  DRITSAS ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Cette notion ne couvre pas les manifestations dont les organisateurs et participants ont des intentions violentes (voir, mutatis mutandis, Stankov et Organisation macédonienne unie Ilinden c. Bulgarie, nos 29221/95 et 29225/95, § 77, CEDH 2001-IX ; G. c. Allemagne, no 13079/87, décision de la Commission du 6 mars 1989, DR 60, p. 256, et Chrétiens contre le racisme et le fascisme c. Royaume-Uni, no 8440/78, 16 juillet 1980, DR 21, p. 138).
• EKMR, 03.12.1993 - 18892/91

  PUTZ v. AUSTRIA

  1 (P7-1) prohibits in particular that existing offences be extended to cover facts which previously clearly did not constitute a criminal offence (cf. No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60 p. 256).
• EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 26258/07

  RAI ET EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Those Convention and domestic cases rather raised various public order, safety and security issues (Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139; Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202; and Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX, as well as G. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, no. 13079/87, Commission decision of 6 March 1989, 60 Decisions and Reports ("DR"), 256; and Çiraklar v. Turkey, No. 19601/92, Commission Decision of 28 October 1998, 80-B DR 46).
• EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  Klaus Croissant

  It is not objectionable that the existing elements of the offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 6683/74, Dec. 10.12.75, D.R. 3, p. 95; No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28, p. 77; No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60, p. 256).
• EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18477/91

  E.G. v. SWITZERLAND

  However, it is not objectionable that the existing elements of a criminal offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60 p. 256).