Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,61452
EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,61452)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.06.2008 - 15591/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,61452)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. Juni 2008 - 15591/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,61452)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,61452) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (34)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    Relevant international documents and reports concerning the conditions in Russian penitentiary establishments can be found in the judgment of 25 October 2005 in the case of Fedotov v. Russia, (no. 5140/02, §§ 54-55), judgment of 10 May 2007 in the case of Benediktov v. Russia, (no. 106/02, § 21) and judgment of 8 November 2005 in the case of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 97-98).

    The Court has also refused to take into account an applicant's earlier periods of detention where his complaints mainly concerned the conditions of the most recent detention (see Khudoyorov v. Russia (dec.), no. 6847/02, 22 February 2005).

    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.; and Andrey Frolov v. Russia, no. 205/02, § 43 and seq., 29 March 2007, which also concerned detention facility.

  • EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

    Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    However the Government did not demonstrate what redress could have been afforded to the applicant by such a measure, taking into account that the problems arising from the conditions of his detention were apparently of a structural nature and did not only concern his personal situation (see Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 57, 1 June 2006 and Benediktov v. Russia, no. 106/02, §§ 29-30, 10 May 2007).

    An outline of the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of detention can be found in a number of judgments concerning Russia (see, in particular, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI, and Mayzit v. Russia no. 63378/00, §§ 34 et seq., 20 January 2005), and the Court does not consider it necessary to repeat it here.

  • EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95

    POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    The Court reiterates that the concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs in which there are continuous activities by or on the part of the State which render the applicant a victim (see Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no. 27824/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-VII).
     
  • EGMR, 01.04.2004 - 50357/99

    CAMBERROW MM5 AD v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    Complaints which have as their source specific events which occurred on identifiable dates cannot be construed as referring to a continuing situation (see Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 50357/99, 1 April 2004).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

    NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.; and Andrey Frolov v. Russia, no. 205/02, § 43 and seq., 29 March 2007, which also concerned detention facility.
  • EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

    FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    A failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, among other authorities, Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 79, ECHR 2005-IV, and Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004).
  • EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

    LABZOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.; and Andrey Frolov v. Russia, no. 205/02, § 43 and seq., 29 March 2007, which also concerned detention facility.
  • EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 72277/01

    DVOYNYKH v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    Further, where an applicant has been released between different periods of detention, the Court has limited the scope of its examination to the later period (see Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, § 46, 12 October 2006, and Grishin v. Russia, no. 30983/02, § 83, 15 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

    KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 147, ECHR 2006-... (extracts).
  • EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03

    TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03
    Hence, the Court has previously refused to treat the time spent by applicants in different detention facilities as a continuing situation in cases where their complaints related to specific episodes, such as force-feeding (see Nevmerzgitskiy v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 58825/00, 25 November 2003), failure to render medical assistance at different facilities (see Tarariyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 4353/03, 11 October 2005) or complaints relating to different detention regimes (see Nurmagomedov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30138/02, 16 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 205/02

    Menschenrechtsgericht rügt erneut Haftbedingungen in Russland

  • EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 30138/02

    NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 30983/02

    GRISHIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.01.2024 - 71555/12

    O.G. ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

    En outre, ainsi qu'elle l'a indiqué à maintes reprises, lorsque la violation alléguée s'analyse en une « situation continue ", le délai pour saisir la Cour ne commence à courir qu'à compter du moment où cette situation a pris fin (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Seleznev c. Russie, no 15591/03, § 34, 26 juin 2008).
  • EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 3324/19

    MEHMET ZEKI DOGAN v. TÜRKIYE (No. 2)

    However, those minimum rights are not aims in themselves: their intrinsic aim is always to contribute to ensuring the fairness of the criminal proceedings as a whole (see Beuze, cited above, § 122; see also Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 77, 20 January 2005, and Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, § 67, 26 June 2008).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

    Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

    When dealing with complaints in relation to conditions of detention that do not simply relate to a specific event, but concern a whole range of problems regarding sanitary conditions, the temperature in the cells, overcrowding, lack of adequate medical treatment and so on, which have affected an inmate throughout his or her incarceration, the Court regards this as a continuing situation, even if the person concerned has been transferred to various detention facilities (see Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, §§ 34-36, 26 June 2008; Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, § 40, 10 July 2008; and Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, §§ 136-38, 24 July 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht