Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BANDALETOV v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3 - Rights of defence Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Bandaletov v. Ukraine

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  The right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 34, Series A no. 277-A, and Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  The right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 34, Series A no. 277-A, and Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 37, Series A no. 275, Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I, Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-X, Balliu v. Albania, no. 74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005, and Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 94, 30 May 2013).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 26103/95

  VAN GEYSEGHEM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 37, Series A no. 275, Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I, Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-X, Balliu v. Albania, no. 74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005, and Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 94, 30 May 2013).
• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 39846/98

  BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 37, Series A no. 275, Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I, Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-X, Balliu v. Albania, no. 74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005, and Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 94, 30 May 2013).

• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275; Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010; and Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180/06, § 54, 31 October 2013).
• EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 10917/15

  SASSI ET BENCHELLALI c. FRANCE

  L'analyse contenue dans l'arrêt ne permet pas de prendre en compte ces éléments clés, notamment les réalités de la situation des requérants en tant que détenus soupçonnés de terrorisme au moment où ils ont été interrogés (voir, mutatis mutandis, Brusco c. France, no 1466/07, § 47, 14 octobre 2010, et Bandaletov c. Ukraine, no 23180/06, § 56, 31 octobre 2013).
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 26892/12

  WANNER v. GERMANY

  26.Das deckt sich mit der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs, wonach eine Person den Status eines Verdächtigen (der die Anwendung der Schutzvorkehrungen aus Artikel 6 nach sich zieht) nicht dann erreicht, wenn ihr dieser förmlich zugewiesen wird, sondern wenn die innerstaatlichen Behörden plausible Gründe für den Verdacht haben, dass die Person an einer Straftat beteiligt war (siehe Bandaletov./. Ukraine, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 23180/06, Rdnr. 56, 31. Oktober 2013, und Sobko./. Ukraine, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 15102/10, Rdnr. 53, 17. Dezember 2015, jeweils in Anwendung der in der Rechtssache Brusco./. Frankreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 1466/07, Rdnr. 47, 14.
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 15269/13

  RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Although he was formally arrested and charged only on 19 October 2011 at 1.35 a.m., given, on the one hand, the reasons that led the police to his apartment and the immediate discovery of possible evidence there (see paragraphs 5-6 above), and, on the other hand, the fact that he was then taken by the police to the police station (see ibid.), the Court considers that 8 p.m. on 18 October 2011 at the latest was the point from which the applicant's situation was substantially affected by the actions taken by the authorities as a result of a suspicion against him (see Simeonovi, cited above, § 110; contrast Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180/06, § 62, 31 October 2013).