Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ARROWSMITH c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Recevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ARROWSMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (11)

• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

  Article 9 does not, however, protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, DR 19; Kalaç v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, § 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Leyla ahin, cited above, §§ 105 and 121).
• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 48420/10

  Eweida u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich - Religionsfreiheit am Arbeitsplatz

  Ainsi, une action ou une omission n'étant pas l'expression directe d'une conviction ou n'ayant qu'un rapport lointain avec un principe de foi échappe à la protection de l'article 9 § 1 (Skugar et autres c. Russie (déc.), no 40010/04, 3 décembre 2009, et, par exemple, Arrowsmith c. Royaume-Uni, no 7050/75, rapport de la Commission du 12 octobre 1978, Décisions et rapports (DR) 19, p. 5, C. c. Royaume-Uni, no 10358/83, rapport de la Commission du 15 décembre 1983, DR 37, p. 142, et Zaoui c. Suisse (déc.), no 41615/98, 18 janvier 2001).
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 23459/03

  BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA

  La Cour a rappelé à plusieurs reprises que l'article 9 ne protège pas n'importe quel acte motivé ou inspiré par une religion ou une conviction (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Kalaç c. Turquie, 1er juillet 1997, § 27, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-IV, Arrowsmith c. Royaume-Uni, no 7050/75, rapport de la Commission du 12 octobre 1978, Décisions et rapports (DR) 19, p. 5, C. c. Royaume-Uni, no 10358/83, décision de la Commission du 15 décembre 1983, DR 37, p. 142, Tepeli et autres c. Turquie (déc.), no 31876/96, 11 septembre 2001, et Leyla Sahin c. Turquie [GC], no 44774/98, § 105, CEDH 2005-XI).

 
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  Article 9 does not, however, protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, DR 19; Kalaç v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, § 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; Leyla ahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 105 and 121, ECHR 2005-XI; and S.A.S., cited above, § 125).
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57792/15

  Kopfbedeckung im Gericht rechtmäßig

  Article 9 does not, however, protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, DR 19, p. 5; Kalaç v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, § 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Leyla ahin, cited above, §§ 105 and 121).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 28.05.2020 - C-238/19

  Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge () und asile) - Vorlage zur …

  Zum weiten Anwendungsbereich von Art. 9 der EMRK vgl. auch eine ältere, aber allgemein bekannte Entscheidung, Bericht der Kommission für Menschenrechte vom 12. Oktober 1978, Arrowsmith/Vereinigtes Königreich (D.R. 19, Nr. 7050/75), zum Schutz sowohl religiöser als auch nicht religiöser Meinungen und Überzeugungen mit kohärenten und ernsthaft vertretenen philosophischen Überzeugungen wie etwa dem Pazifismus.
• EGMR, 12.03.2024 - 18382/15

  KANATLI c. TÜRKIYE

  La Cour rappelle que les organes de la Convention ont considéré qu'en tant que philosophie, le pacifisme peut être considéré comme une conviction (« belief ") protégée par l'article 9 de la Convention (Arrowsmith c. Royaume-Uni, no 7050/75, rapport de la Commission du 12 octobre 1978, Décisions et rapports (DR) 19, p. 33).
• EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 24095/94

  EFSTRATIOU v. GREECE

  They relied on the Commission's opinion in the case of Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom (application no. 7050/75, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 19, para. 69), according to which pacifism as a philosophy fell within the ambit of the right to freedom of thought and conscience, and the attitude of pacifism could thus be seen as a belief protected by Article 9 para.
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 6)

  Moreover, the context in which the opinions were expressed can be distinguished, as regards their potential impact, from that of the Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom case, in which the applicant, a pacifist activist, had distributed a leaflet inciting servicemen to desert at a military camp occupied by troops who were shortly to be posted to Northern Ireland (see Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 19, p. 5).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 56827/00

  DUZGOREN v. TURKEY

  In addition, the context in which the opinions were expressed can be distinguished, as regards their potential impact, from that of the Arrowsmith case, in which the applicant, a pacifist activist, had distributed a leaflet inciting servicemen to desert at a military camp occupied by troops who were shortly to be posted to Northern Ireland (see Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission's report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 19, p. 5).
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 70335/01

  YURDATAPAN v. TURKEY