Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 14+11-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Form and join ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AMBER GRID LTD. EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  DANILENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  The Court has previously acknowledged that a lack of protection for employees from discrimination by the employer on the grounds of their trade union activities could have a chilling effect and discourage other persons from joining that trade union, which could in turn lead to its disappearance (see Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96 and 2 others, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 135, ECHR 2009 (extracts); and Trade Union of the Police in the Slovak Republic and Others v. Slovakia, no. 11828/08, §§ 60-61, 25 September 2012).
• EuGH, 17.07.2008 - C-303/06

  DAS GEMEINSCHAFTSRECHT SCHÜTZT EINEN ARBEITNEHMER, DER WEGEN EINER BEHINDERUNG …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  In this connection, the Supreme Court relied on the following: judgment of 11 July 2006, Sonia Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA, C-13/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:456, in which the CJEU had held that Directive 2000/78/EC could not be extended by analogy to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sickness; judgment of 17 July 2008, S. Coleman v Attridge Law and Steve Law, C-303/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:415, in which the CJEU had reiterated the aforementioned conclusion but had found that Directive 2000/78/EC covered situations in which an employee had been treated less favourably on the grounds of the disability of his or her child; and judgment of 18 December 2014, Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v Kommunernes Landsforening (KL), C-354/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2463, in which the CJEU had held that obesity could not be regarded as a ground for dismissal, in addition to those grounds in respect of which Directive 2000/78/EC prohibited discrimination.
• EGMR, 11.01.2006 - 52562/99

  SØRENSEN ET RASMUSSEN c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole (see Sørensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark [GC], nos. 52562/99 and 52620/99, § 58, ECHR 2006-I, and the cases cited therein).

 
• EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 11828/08

  TRADE UNION OF THE POLICE IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  The Court has previously acknowledged that a lack of protection for employees from discrimination by the employer on the grounds of their trade union activities could have a chilling effect and discourage other persons from joining that trade union, which could in turn lead to its disappearance (see Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96 and 2 others, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 135, ECHR 2009 (extracts); and Trade Union of the Police in the Slovak Republic and Others v. Slovakia, no. 11828/08, §§ 60-61, 25 September 2012).
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that the Convention does not provide for the institution of an actio popularis and that its task is not normally to review the relevant law and practice in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which they were applied to, or affected, the applicants gave rise to a violation of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 164, ECHR 2015).
• EuGH, 18.12.2014 - C-354/13

  Adipositas kann eine "Behinderung" im Sinne der Richtlinie über die …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  In this connection, the Supreme Court relied on the following: judgment of 11 July 2006, Sonia Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA, C-13/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:456, in which the CJEU had held that Directive 2000/78/EC could not be extended by analogy to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sickness; judgment of 17 July 2008, S. Coleman v Attridge Law and Steve Law, C-303/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:415, in which the CJEU had reiterated the aforementioned conclusion but had found that Directive 2000/78/EC covered situations in which an employee had been treated less favourably on the grounds of the disability of his or her child; and judgment of 18 December 2014, Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v Kommunernes Landsforening (KL), C-354/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2463, in which the CJEU had held that obesity could not be regarded as a ground for dismissal, in addition to those grounds in respect of which Directive 2000/78/EC prohibited discrimination.
• EuGH, 11.07.2006 - C-13/05

  DER GERICHTSHOF ÄUSSERT SICH ERSTMALS ZUM BEGRIFF "BEHINDERUNG" IM SINNE DER …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  In this connection, the Supreme Court relied on the following: judgment of 11 July 2006, Sonia Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA, C-13/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:456, in which the CJEU had held that Directive 2000/78/EC could not be extended by analogy to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sickness; judgment of 17 July 2008, S. Coleman v Attridge Law and Steve Law, C-303/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:415, in which the CJEU had reiterated the aforementioned conclusion but had found that Directive 2000/78/EC covered situations in which an employee had been treated less favourably on the grounds of the disability of his or her child; and judgment of 18 December 2014, Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v Kommunernes Landsforening (KL), C-354/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2463, in which the CJEU had held that obesity could not be regarded as a ground for dismissal, in addition to those grounds in respect of which Directive 2000/78/EC prohibited discrimination.

• VG Hamburg, 21.09.2020 - 7 AE 3149/20

  Afghanistan: Dublin: keine systemischen Mängel in Norwegen; konkrete Anschrift …

  Auch zu dem im Hauptsacheverfahren mit Schriftsatz vom 26.11.2019 vorgetragenen Krankenhausaufenthalt wegen "erheblicher gesundheitlicher Einschränkungen" (Bl. 5 1 , Gerichtsakte 7 A 2939/19) wurden keine Nach weise, Berichte oder sonstigen Erläuterungen in das Eilverfahren eingebracht oder zu den beigezogenen Gerichtsakten (7 A 2939/19, 7 AE 976/20) oder der Asylakte gereicht.