Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SULTYGOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish first whether these costs and expenses were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324, and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 147, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish first whether these costs and expenses were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324, and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 147, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  The Court reiterates that the word "victim" in the context of Article 34 of the Convention denotes the person directly affected by the act or omission in issue (see Lüdi v Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 34, Series A no. 238).

 
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  Whether a failure on the part of the authorities to provide a plausible explanation as to a detainee's fate, in the absence of a body, might also raise issues under Article 2 of the Convention will depend on all the circumstances of the case, and in particular on the existence of sufficient circumstantial evidence, based on specific evidence, from which it may be concluded to the requisite standard of proof that the detainee must be presumed to have died in custody (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV, and Ertak v. Turkey, no. 20764/92, § 131, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  In fact, human rights cases before the Court generally also have a moral dimension, and people close to an applicant may have a legitimate interest in ensuring that justice is done, even after the applicant's death (see, among other authorities, Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005, and Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  It is especially in respect of the latter that a relative may claim directly to be a victim of the authorities" conduct (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII, § 164).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  It is especially in respect of the latter that a relative may claim directly to be a victim of the authorities" conduct (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII, § 164).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  In this respect the Court considers that such a situation gives rise to issues which go beyond a mere "irregular detention" in violation of Article 5. Such an interpretation is in keeping with the effective protection of the right to life as afforded by Article 2, which ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention (see, among other authorities, Çakıcı cited above, § 86, and Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 83, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 09.05.2000 - 20764/92

  ERTAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  Whether a failure on the part of the authorities to provide a plausible explanation as to a detainee's fate, in the absence of a body, might also raise issues under Article 2 of the Convention will depend on all the circumstances of the case, and in particular on the existence of sufficient circumstantial evidence, based on specific evidence, from which it may be concluded to the requisite standard of proof that the detainee must be presumed to have died in custody (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV, and Ertak v. Turkey, no. 20764/92, § 131, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 17.05.2005 - 74456/01

  HORVATHOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 42575/07

  In fact, human rights cases before the Court generally also have a moral dimension, and people close to an applicant may have a legitimate interest in ensuring that justice is done, even after the applicant's death (see, among other authorities, Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, § 26, 17 May 2005, and Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX).

• EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 5374/07

  YANDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  42575/07 and 11 others, §§ 381-386).
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 50606/08

  MEZHIDOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  42575/07 and 11 others, §§ 369-74, 9 October 2014.
• EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14

  B.Y. c. GRÈCE

  Appréciation de la Cour 77. Les principes généraux pertinents en l'espèce ont été résumés dans les arrêts El-Masri (précité, §§ 151-153), Sultygov et autres c. Russie (nos 42575/07 et 11 autres, §§ 393-396, 9 octobre 2014), Nasr et Ghali c. Italie (no 44883/09, §§ 280-283, 23 février 2016) et Al Nashiri c. Roumanie, (no 33234/12, §§ 490-498, 31 mai 2018, avec les références citées).
• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 48608/19

  BISULTANOVY v. RUSSIA

  42575/07 and 11 others, §§ 393-96 and § 444, 9 October 2014.