Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GROZA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5095/71

  Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen, Pedersen u.a. ./. Dänemark

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 31017/05

  By binding themselves not to "deny the right to education", the Contracting States guarantee to anyone within their jurisdiction a right of access to educational institutions existing at a given time and the possibility of drawing, by official recognition of the studies completed, profit from the education received (see Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, § 52, Series A no. 23 and the Case "relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium" (merits), 23 July 1968, pp.
• EGMR, 25.02.1982 - 7511/76

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 31017/05

  The Court further recognised that in spite of its importance the right to education is not absolute, but may be subject to limitations, provided that there is no injury to the substance of the right (Belgian Linguistics Case, cited above, p. 28, § 5 and Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, § 41, Series A no. 48).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 289/14

  STOIAN v. ROMANIA

  Relying on McIntyre v. the United Kingdom (no. 29046/95, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported) and Groza v. Romania ((dec.), no. 31017/05, 21 February 2012), the Government argued that the measures taken by the authorities were proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.