Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AVDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AVDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 39294/09

  PERUZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  Accordingly, the grounds for the applicant's conviction for defamation were relevant and sufficient (see, for comparison, Peruzzi v. Italy, no. 39294/09, 30 June 2015; Vitrenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23510/02, 16 December 2008; and Béchis v. France (dec.) [Committee], no. 10611/18, 18 March 2021).
• EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 53028/14

  MONICA MACOVEI v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  The general principles developed by the Court in that regard have been summarised, among others, in Monica Macovei v. Romania (no. 53028/14, §§ 72-81, 28 July 2020).
• EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 4035/08

  Affaire Barata Monteiro Da Costa Nogueira und Patricio Pereira ./. Portugal

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  In making an assessment on proportionality, the Court is to rely on the facts of the case as established at the domestic level (see Barata Monteiro da Costa Nogueira and Patrício Pereira v. Portugal, no. 4035/08, § 33, 11 January 2011).

 
• EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 3316/04

  BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  It has not been claimed that the applicant was not given a fair chance in the domestic proceedings to prove the veracity of his allegations; in particular, the Court observes that the defence of truth is provided for under Article 147 § 2 of the Criminal Code (see Bozhkov v. Bulgaria, no. 3316/04, § 28, 19 April 2011).
• EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 10611/18

  BÉCHIS c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  Accordingly, the grounds for the applicant's conviction for defamation were relevant and sufficient (see, for comparison, Peruzzi v. Italy, no. 39294/09, 30 June 2015; Vitrenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23510/02, 16 December 2008; and Béchis v. France (dec.) [Committee], no. 10611/18, 18 March 2021).
• EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 23510/02

  VITRENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  Accordingly, the grounds for the applicant's conviction for defamation were relevant and sufficient (see, for comparison, Peruzzi v. Italy, no. 39294/09, 30 June 2015; Vitrenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23510/02, 16 December 2008; and Béchis v. France (dec.) [Committee], no. 10611/18, 18 March 2021).
• EGMR, 30.01.2014 - 34400/10

  DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO c. FRANCE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  The Court has held that, while representatives of political parties must be allowed to discuss their opponents and the manner in which the latter perform public duties, they are equally required to exercise some restraint when encroaching upon the reputation and the rights of others (see Barata Monteiro da Costa Nogueira and Patrício Pereira, cited above, § 37, and De Lesquen du Plessis-Casso v. France (no. 2), no. 34400/10, § 33, 30 January 2014).
• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 52358/15

  GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 34496/19

  The applicant was relieved of criminal liability (see, for a description of the relevant domestic provisions, Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria, no. 52358/15, § 41, 30 November 2021) and an administrative fine was imposed of BGN 1, 000 (about EUR 510).