Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KALICKI v. POLAND

  No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KALICKI v. POLAND

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 46797/08

  In all cases the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interest (see, for example, Byrzykowski, cited above, § 95, Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 92, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01

  REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 46797/08

  The Court considers that, except in extraordinary cases, an application may only be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see the Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, §§ 53-54; I.S. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 32438/96, 6 April 2000; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004; and Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014).

• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 11167/12

  BAKANOVA v. LITHUANIA

  Nevertheless, in this context the Court also recalls that the authorities must take the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see Kalicki v. Poland, no. 46797/08, § 51, 8 December 2015).

  We find that the available forensic evidence enabled the establishment of the cause of death (natural causes) as required by the case-law, and the additional deficiencies of the investigation (e.g. failure, due to delays, to obtain relevant logbooks to enable the authorities to determine the possibility of fumes which could not have caused the heart attack) had no bearing on the elements which had to be determined under the Kalicki test (Kalicki v. Poland, no. 46797/08, § 51, 8 December 2015).