Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/08, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08, 25845/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/08, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08, 25845/08 (https://dejure.org/2009,69621)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.07.2009 - 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/08, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08, 25845/08 (https://dejure.org/2009,69621)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Juli 2009 - 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/08, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08, 25845/08 (https://dejure.org/2009,69621)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,69621) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TARNOPOLSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2003-IX), such as the need to correct a fundamental error (see Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 31-33, 31 July 2008). - EGMR, 07.07.2005 - 41302/02
MALINOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07
The judgments thus created an asset within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Vasilopoulou v. Greece, no. 47541/99, § 22, 21 March 2002, and Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 43, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 13151/04
PROTSENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2003-IX), such as the need to correct a fundamental error (see Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 31-33, 31 July 2008). - EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03
DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07
The quashing of these judgments in breach of the principle of legal certainty frustrated the applicants' reliance on the binding judicial decisions and deprived them of an opportunity to receive the judicial awards they had legitimately expected to receive (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 35, 7 June 2007). - EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 59109/00
JOVANOVIC contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07
The Convention only governs facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see Jovanovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 41760/09
KAPLAN c. RUSSIE
Les dispositions pertinentes du droit matériel en matière de pensions de retraite sont exposées dans l'arrêt Tarnopolskaya et autres c. Russie (nos 11093/07 et 19 autres, §§ 16-25, 9 juillet 2009).Sur le fond, elle estimait, avec référence à l'arrêt Tarnopolskaya et autres c. Russie (nos 11093/07 et 19 autres, 9 juillet 2009), que la procédure de révision du jugement définitif avait violé le principe de res judicata et l'avait privée de son bien (pension de vieillesse).
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 7873/09
SHEYMAN v. RUSSIA
In consequence, they offered a sum of compensation for non-pecuniary damage which is in line with Court's awards in similar cases (Tarnopolskaya and Others v. Russia, nos. 11093/07 et seq., § 57, 7 July 2009).