Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 35989/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,59311) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RAMADAN & AHJREDINI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 44599/98
BENSAID c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 35989/03
In any event, the fact that the applicants" circumstances in their country of origin would be less favourable than those enjoyed by them while residing in the Netherlands cannot be regarded as decisive from the point of view of Article 3 (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-I). - EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 45276/99
Tansania, CUF, Civic United Front, Oppositionelle, Inhaftierung, Folter, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 35989/03
However, in exercising their right to expel such aliens Contracting States must have regard to Article 3 of the Convention which enshrines one of the fundamental values of democratic societies (see, among others, Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, § 59, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 35373/97
A. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 35989/03
The Court reiterates its constant case-law according to which Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see, amongst many authorities, A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, § 110, ECHR 2002-X).