Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 28215/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,13199) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BADALYAN v. ARMENIA
Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BADALYAN v. ARMENIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 28215/11
It follows that the Court has temporal jurisdiction to examine the applicant's complaints, limited, however, to the procedural steps which were or ought to have been taken after the critical date (see Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, §§ 140-51, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 28215/11
The Court therefore lacks sufficient grounds to accept the Government's non-exhaustion claim, especially taking into account the fact that the proceedings in question concerned the applicant's request to be recognised as a victim, a procedural step which the investigating authority was required to take - both under domestic law and under the procedural obligation of Article 3 - of its own motion without leaving it to the applicant's own initiative (see, mutatis mutandis, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII).