Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17, 49116/20 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,27565) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ARDABYEVSKIY AND FARADZHEVA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
DALBAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17
Accordingly, the Court finds that Mrs Ardabyevskaya has standing to continue the proceedings in the applicant's stead (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17
32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), regarding detention in a metal cage during court hearings. - EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 73359/10
ERGEZEN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17
For its part, the Court reiterates that in determining this matter the decisive point is not whether the rights in question are transferable to the heirs wishing to pursue the procedure, but whether the heirs or the next of kin can in principle claim a legitimate interest in requesting the Court to deal with the case on the basis of the applicant's wish to exercise his or her individual and personal right to lodge an application with the Court (see Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014; Barakhoyev v. Russia, no. 8516/08, §§ 22-23, 17 January 2017; and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06
KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17
45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 87 and 117, 12 December 2017). - EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 8516/08
BARAKHOYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 73364/17
For its part, the Court reiterates that in determining this matter the decisive point is not whether the rights in question are transferable to the heirs wishing to pursue the procedure, but whether the heirs or the next of kin can in principle claim a legitimate interest in requesting the Court to deal with the case on the basis of the applicant's wish to exercise his or her individual and personal right to lodge an application with the Court (see Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014; Barakhoyev v. Russia, no. 8516/08, §§ 22-23, 17 January 2017; and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos.