Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 44142/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,3878) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ASMAYEV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Asmayev v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 13151/04
PROTSENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 44142/05
Departures from the legal certainty principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Kot, cited above, § 24; Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 25-34, 31 July 2008; and Tishkevich v. Russia, no. 2202/05, §§ 25-26, 4 December 2008). - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 2202/05
TISHKEVICH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 44142/05
Departures from the legal certainty principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Kot, cited above, § 24; Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 25-34, 31 July 2008; and Tishkevich v. Russia, no. 2202/05, §§ 25-26, 4 December 2008). - EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 36495/02
KURINNYY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 44142/05
In such cases, the Court has to assess, in particular, whether a fair balance was struck between the interests of the applicants and the need to ensure the proper administration of justice (see, mutatis mutandis, Kurinnyy v. Russia, no. 36495/02, §§ 13, 27-28, 12 June 2008). - EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 40713/04
SHCHUROV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 44142/05
The judgment in question can be quashed exclusively in order to rectify an error of truly fundamental importance to the judicial system (see Shchurov v. Russia, no. 40713/04, § 21, 29 March 2011).
- EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 47388/06
SAMAROV v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates that the incorrect application of domestic law or establishment of the facts do not on their own constitute a fundamental defect within the meaning of its case-law (see, amongst many other authorities, Asmayev v. Russia, no. 44142/05, § 55, 14 March 2013).