Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 62276/16, 46584/18, 44633/19, 46456/19, 51396/19, 51992/19, 24938/20, 24955/20, 25070/20, 25578/20, 32517/20, 45169/20 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 62276/16, 46584/18, 44633/19, 46456/19, 51396/19, 51992/19, 24938/20, 24955/20, 25070/20, 25578/20, 32517/20, 45169/20 (https://dejure.org/2021,41246)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.10.2021 - 62276/16, 46584/18, 44633/19, 46456/19, 51396/19, 51992/19, 24938/20, 24955/20, 25070/20, 25578/20, 32517/20, 45169/20 (https://dejure.org/2021,41246)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Oktober 2021 - 62276/16, 46584/18, 44633/19, 46456/19, 51396/19, 51992/19, 24938/20, 24955/20, 25070/20, 25578/20, 32517/20, 45169/20 (https://dejure.org/2021,41246)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,41246) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KADALA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 62276/16
That said, having regard to the facts of the case and in the light of all the material in its possession, as well as its findings under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the Court considers that the complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references; and, for similar approach, Korotyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 13122/11 and 2 others, §§ 36-40, 27 June 2017; Kamneva and Others, cited above, and, mutatis mutandis, Tkhyegepso and Others v. Russia, no. 44387/04 and 11 others, §§ 21-24, 25 October 2011). - EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 13122/11
KOROTYAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 62276/16
That said, having regard to the facts of the case and in the light of all the material in its possession, as well as its findings under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the Court considers that the complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references; and, for similar approach, Korotyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 13122/11 and 2 others, §§ 36-40, 27 June 2017; Kamneva and Others, cited above, and, mutatis mutandis, Tkhyegepso and Others v. Russia, no. 44387/04 and 11 others, §§ 21-24, 25 October 2011). - EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 44387/04
TKHYEGEPSO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 62276/16
That said, having regard to the facts of the case and in the light of all the material in its possession, as well as its findings under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the Court considers that the complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references; and, for similar approach, Korotyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 13122/11 and 2 others, §§ 36-40, 27 June 2017; Kamneva and Others, cited above, and, mutatis mutandis, Tkhyegepso and Others v. Russia, no. 44387/04 and 11 others, §§ 21-24, 25 October 2011).