Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 6484/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68139) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FEDOTOV v. MOLDOVA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96
VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 6484/05
With regard to the Government's submission concerning the alleged abuse, the Court considers that an application would not normally be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention unless it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208/01, 18 May 2004; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 49, 18 January 2005). - EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01
REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 6484/05
With regard to the Government's submission concerning the alleged abuse, the Court considers that an application would not normally be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention unless it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208/01, 18 May 2004; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 49, 18 January 2005). - EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01
POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 6484/05
With regard to the Government's submission concerning the alleged abuse, the Court considers that an application would not normally be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention unless it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208/01, 18 May 2004; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 49, 18 January 2005).