Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DATUNASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02

  HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007).
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 24652/09

  STOJNIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  Having regard to the importance of that information for the proper determination of the present case, the Court, drawing parallels with similar cases examined by it in the past, finds that the either deliberate or negligent conduct of the applicant was contrary to the purpose of her right of individual petition as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (compare, amongst many other authorities, with Lozinschi v. Moldova (dec.), no. 33052/05, 4 November 2008; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Jovanovic v. Serbia (dec.) [Committee], no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014, and also Stojnic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 24652/09, 6 October 2015).
• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 26446/06

  KHVICHIA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  Having regard to the importance of that information for the proper determination of the present case, the Court, drawing parallels with similar cases examined by it in the past, finds that the either deliberate or negligent conduct of the applicant was contrary to the purpose of her right of individual petition as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (compare, amongst many other authorities, with Lozinschi v. Moldova (dec.), no. 33052/05, 4 November 2008; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Jovanovic v. Serbia (dec.) [Committee], no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014, and also Stojnic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 24652/09, 6 October 2015).

 
• EGMR, 07.03.2014 - 40348/08

  JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  Having regard to the importance of that information for the proper determination of the present case, the Court, drawing parallels with similar cases examined by it in the past, finds that the either deliberate or negligent conduct of the applicant was contrary to the purpose of her right of individual petition as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (compare, amongst many other authorities, with Lozinschi v. Moldova (dec.), no. 33052/05, 4 November 2008; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Jovanovic v. Serbia (dec.) [Committee], no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014, and also Stojnic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 24652/09, 6 October 2015).
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 33052/05

  LOZINSCHI v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  Having regard to the importance of that information for the proper determination of the present case, the Court, drawing parallels with similar cases examined by it in the past, finds that the either deliberate or negligent conduct of the applicant was contrary to the purpose of her right of individual petition as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (compare, amongst many other authorities, with Lozinschi v. Moldova (dec.), no. 33052/05, 4 November 2008; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Jovanovic v. Serbia (dec.) [Committee], no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014, and also Stojnic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 24652/09, 6 October 2015).
• EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 44328/05

  PIRTSKHALAISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 40099/09

  Having regard to the importance of that information for the proper determination of the present case, the Court, drawing parallels with similar cases examined by it in the past, finds that the either deliberate or negligent conduct of the applicant was contrary to the purpose of her right of individual petition as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (compare, amongst many other authorities, with Lozinschi v. Moldova (dec.), no. 33052/05, 4 November 2008; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Jovanovic v. Serbia (dec.) [Committee], no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014, and also Stojnic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 24652/09, 6 October 2015).