Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76328/16, 19928/17, 71434/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,18001) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGHEL v. ROMANIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ANGHEL v. ROMANIA and 2 other applications
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98
KARNER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76328/16
In fact, human rights cases before the Court generally also have a moral dimension, and persons close to an applicant may have a legitimate interest in seeing to it that justice is done even after the applicant's death (see, among many other authorities, Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 22, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23524/14
MÎTU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76328/16
In examining them it may take account of the quality of the domestic proceedings and any possible flaws in the decision-making process (see Mî?£u v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 23524/14, § 29, 30 June 2020, and all the references cited therein).