Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 43301/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LVIN v. RUSSIA
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 43301/07
- EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 43301/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 74826/01
SHOFMAN CONTRE LA FEDERATION DE RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 43301/07
In general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see Shofman v. Russia, no. 74826/01, § 53, 24 November 2005, with further references).In general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see Shofman v. Russia, no: 74826/01, § 53, 24 November 2005, with further references).
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 33343/03
TARVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 43301/07
The decision on appropriate measures to enforce the judicial award, or, if this proves impossible, granting the applicant reasonable compensation, or a combination of these and other measures, falls to the respondent State (see, mutandis mutadis, Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007).The decision on appropriate measures to enforce the judicial award, or, if this proves impossible, granting the applicant's heir Ms Yelena Vadimovna Lvina reasonable compensation, or a combination of these and other measures, falls to the respondent State (see, mutandis mutadis, Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007).
- EGMR, 03.12.2009 - 13652/06
HUMBATOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 43301/07
By finding a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the present case, the Court has established the Government's obligation to take appropriate measures to remedy the applicant's individual situation, that is to ensure compliance with the applicant's enforceable claim under the judgment of 9 April 2007 (see, for instance, Humbatov v. Azerbaijan, no. 13652/06, § 38, 3 December 2009, with further references).By finding a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the present case, the Court has established the Government's obligation to take appropriate measures to remedy the applicant's individual situation, that is to ensure compliance with the applicant's enforceable claim under the judgment of 9 April 2007 (see, for instance, Humbatov v. Azerbaijan, no. 13652/06, § 38, 3 December 2009, with further references).