Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 39105/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,55827) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JAANTI v. FINLAND
(englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 39105/05
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 39105/05
According to the Court's case-law, Article 6 § 1 does not, however, require a detailed answer to every argument (see, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288). - EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 13867/88
BRINCAT v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 39105/05
Furthermore, the Court reiterates that under Article 41 of the Convention no awards are made in respect of the time or work put into an application by the applicant as this cannot be regarded as monetary costs actually incurred by him or her (see, Brincat v. Italy, 26 November 1992, § 29, Series A no. 249-A, Pétur Thór Sigurðsson v. Iceland, no. 39731/98, §§ 52 and 54, ECHR 2003-IV, Lehtinen v. Finland (no. 2), no. 41585/98, § 57, 8 June 2006). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 41585/98
LEHTINEN v. FINLAND (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 39105/05
Furthermore, the Court reiterates that under Article 41 of the Convention no awards are made in respect of the time or work put into an application by the applicant as this cannot be regarded as monetary costs actually incurred by him or her (see, Brincat v. Italy, 26 November 1992, § 29, Series A no. 249-A, Pétur Thór Sigurðsson v. Iceland, no. 39731/98, §§ 52 and 54, ECHR 2003-IV, Lehtinen v. Finland (no. 2), no. 41585/98, § 57, 8 June 2006).