Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,8382) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10
Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
12/10/2010. - OLG Düsseldorf, 27.05.2008 - Kart 9/07
Die Absprache meherer mit einander im Wettbewerb stehender Lokalagenten sog. …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
11/07/2014. - VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11
Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
16/11/2009.
- RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03
Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
28/03/2011. - FG Nürnberg, 27.07.2004 - I 17/04
Tragen von Aufwendungen für ein Wirtschaftsgut durch eine Kapitalgesellschaft; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
17/04/2010. - EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 2269/06
R. KACAPOR AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
In the leading cases of R. Kacapor and Others v. Serbia (nos. 2269/06 and 5 others, §§ 97-99, 106-16 and 119-20, 15 January 2008), and Mijanovic v. Montenegro (no. 19580/06, §§ 81-91, 17 September 2013), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 28754/10
MASTILOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and its own case-law (see, in particular, R. Kacapor and Others, cited above, §§ 123-26; Sto?.ic v. Serbia, no. 64931/10, §§ 66-68, 1 October 2013; and Mastilovic and Others v. Montenegro, no. 28754/10, § 52, 24 February 2022) the Court considers it reasonable not to award the applicants compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage because it has already been awarded domestically (see paragraph 6 above), but to award them a sum for costs and expenses indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 64931/10
STOSIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 21614/20
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and its own case-law (see, in particular, R. Kacapor and Others, cited above, §§ 123-26; Sto?.ic v. Serbia, no. 64931/10, §§ 66-68, 1 October 2013; and Mastilovic and Others v. Montenegro, no. 28754/10, § 52, 24 February 2022) the Court considers it reasonable not to award the applicants compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage because it has already been awarded domestically (see paragraph 6 above), but to award them a sum for costs and expenses indicated in the appended table.