Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  W.O. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5+5-4 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-4 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  W.O. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2022 - 36896/18

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the above-mentioned complaints (see, among many other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania (GC), no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Azer Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 3409/10, § 79, 22 July 2021).
• EGMR, 02.03.2021 - 36037/17

  R.R. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2022 - 36896/18

  The general conditions and services provided in the Röszke transit zone are described in R.R. and Others v. Hungary (no. 36037/17, §§ 10-12, 14-17 and 30-31, 2 March 2021).
• EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 3409/10

  AZER AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2022 - 36896/18

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the above-mentioned complaints (see, among many other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania (GC), no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Azer Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 3409/10, § 79, 22 July 2021).

• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 53528/19

  O.Q. v. HUNGARY

  Similarly, in W.O. and Others v. Hungary ([Committee], no. 36896/18, § 13, 25 August 2022) the Court found a violation of Article 3 on account of food deprivation for six days.

  Article 5 is therefore applicable (compare W.O. and Others v. Hungary [Committee], no. 36896/18, §§ 4 and 15, 25 August 2022).

• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 53272/17

  P.S. AND A.M. v. HUNGARY

  The Court is thus not convinced that she was provided with the adequate care and considers that the conditions of confinement, the related constraints and insecurity must have caused the first applicant significant psychological suffering, of which the authorities must have been aware (compare W.O. and Others v. Hungary [Committee], no. 36896/18, § 12, 25 August 2022).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 17089/19

  S.AB. AND S.AR. v. HUNGARY

  In that case the Court, emphasising the primary significance of the passage of time for the application of Article 3 in situations such as the present one, found a violation of this provision on account of the conditions to which the applicants children were subjected during their almost four-months-long stay in the Röszke transit zone (see R.R. and Others, cited above, §§ 58-60 and 63-65, compare M.B.K. and Others v. Hungary [Committee], no. 73860/17, § 6, 24 February 2022 and W.O. and Others v. Hungary [Committee], no. 36896/18, §§ 9-10, 25 August 2022).