Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  The applicant's subjective feeling about the impact of the alleged violations has to be justifiable on objective grounds (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, 1 July 2010).
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 45175/04

  SHEFER v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  As far as individual perceptions encompass not only the monetary aspect of a violation, but also the applicant's general interest in pursuing the case or a fundamental question of principle (see Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no. 45175/04, §§ 21 and 23, 13 March 2012), the Court recalls that the applicant's behaviour must be consistent with that importance (see Shefer, cited above, §§ 24-26).
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 34615/02

  KRAVCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  In the performance of its task, the Court is free to attribute to the facts of the case, as established on the evidence before it, a characterisation in law different from that given by the applicant or, if need be, to view the facts in a different manner (see Kravchenko v. Russia, no. 34615/02, § 27, 2 April 2009).

 
• EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 49275/08

  BAZELYUK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  The Court notes that the amount that the applicant had to give up as a result of the quashing of the judicial order was moderate - EUR 280 (compare with Burov v. Moldova (dec.), no. 38875/03, 14 June 2011; Bazelyuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 49275/08, 27 March 2012; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011).
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 52036/09

  KIOUSI c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  The Court notes that the amount that the applicant had to give up as a result of the quashing of the judicial order was moderate - EUR 280 (compare with Burov v. Moldova (dec.), no. 38875/03, 14 June 2011; Bazelyuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 49275/08, 27 March 2012; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011).
• EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 15909/13

  VAN DER PUTTEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  The Court sees no need to answer the applicant's further arguments, as the complaint is anyway inadmissible for another reason (see Van der Putten v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 15909/13, § 28, 27 August 2013).
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 38875/03

  BUROV v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 35722/04

  The Court notes that the amount that the applicant had to give up as a result of the quashing of the judicial order was moderate - EUR 280 (compare with Burov v. Moldova (dec.), no. 38875/03, 14 June 2011; Bazelyuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 49275/08, 27 March 2012; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011).