Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 41217/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60294) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHAHBAZI v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 22.10.1997 - 34225/96
SHAHZAD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 41217/08
Application No. 34225/96 by Mohammed Halid SHAHZAD against the United Kingdom __________==.Having regard to the application introduced on 1 February 1996 by Mohammed Halid SHAHZAD against the United Kingdom and registered on 18 December 1996 under file No. 34225/96;.
- EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 41217/08
The Commission recalls that in order to determine whether the aim of Article 6 (Art. 6) - a fair trial - has been achieved regard must be had to the entirety of the domestic proceedings conducted in the case (Eur. Court HR, Imbroscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 14, para. 38; Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43). - EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 41217/08
The Commission recalls that in order to determine whether the aim of Article 6 (Art. 6) - a fair trial - has been achieved regard must be had to the entirety of the domestic proceedings conducted in the case (Eur. Court HR, Imbroscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 14, para. 38; Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43). - EKMR, 10.03.1989 - 12013/86
ALBERTI contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 41217/08
However, the Commission is not competent to examine alleged errors of fact or law committed by the domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or the Protocols to the Convention (No. 12013/86, Dec. 10.3.89, D.R. 59, p. 100).