Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.09.2020 - 75112/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43067) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MATOZAN v. CROATIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2020 - 75112/14
The Court's task under the Convention is rather to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was admitted, were fair (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 31, Series A no. 274). - EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 58428/10
MATYTSINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2020 - 75112/14
It is normally not the Court's role to determine whether a particular expert report available to the domestic judge was reliable or not (see Matytsina v. Russia, no. 58428/10, § 169, 27 March 2014).
- EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 57597/17
M.U. v. CROATIA
Therefore, following the applicant's general practitioner's conclusion that she was incapable of work, three different expert bodies examined the applicant's medical condition, all of which took into account the arguments she had submitted during the proceedings (compare Krunoslava Zovko v. Croatia, no. 56935/13, § 49, 23 May 2017; Trbojevic v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 57228/13, § 37, 15 May 2018, and Matozan v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 75112/14, § 39, 29 September 2020).